CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki Swift vs MG MG3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Swift vs MG MG3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiMG
Price (RRP)$23,990$20,990
Power61kW81kW
0-100 km/h12.4s10.8s
Fuel Economy4.6 L/100km6 L/100km
Boot Space267L293L
Towing750kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km10yr / 250k km
ANCAP Safety4 Stars4 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki Swift starts from $23,990 before on-road costs, while the MG MG3 opens at $20,990. That makes the MG MG3 the more affordable entry point by $3,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $26,389 and $23,089 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Swift by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Suzuki Swift and MG MG3 hold a 4-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 47% for the Suzuki Swift and 74% for the MG MG3.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MG MG3 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Suzuki Swift.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Suzuki Swift and 6 in the MG MG3.

Feature Showdown

The Suzuki Swift features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the MG MG3 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG MG3 counters with power tailgate that the Suzuki Swift does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Swift uses a Petrol producing 61kW and 112Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12.4 seconds.

The MG MG3 responds with a Petrol making 81kW and 142Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.8 seconds.

The MG MG3 has the clear power advantage at 81kW vs 61kW. In the real-world sprint, the MG MG3 is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Swift measures 3,860mm long on a 2,450mm wheelbase, 253mm shorter than the MG MG3 at 4,113mm (2,570mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG MG3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 267L in the Suzuki Swift and 293L in the MG MG3, giving the MG MG3 a 26L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 10.2m

Suzuki Swift GL
9.8mTighter
Best
MG MG3 Vibe
10.2m
Worst
Suzuki Swift
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
MG MG3
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,311/year for the Suzuki Swift and $1,710/year for the MG MG3. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Swift.

Estimated annual total: $1,311 (Suzuki Swift) vs $1,710 (MG MG3). The Suzuki Swift saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift) vs 10 years / 250,000km (MG MG3). The MG MG3 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG MG3 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG MG3 takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki Swift will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. The MG MG3 adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks