CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMahindra XUV 3XO vs Suzuki Swift
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mahindra XUV 3XO vs Suzuki Swift

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMahindraSuzuki
Price (RRP)$21,800$16,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power82kW70kW
0-100 km/h10.4s
Fuel Economy6.5 L/100km5.5 L/100km
Boot Space364L210L
Warranty7yr / 150k km3yr / 100k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Mahindra XUV 3XO & Suzuki Swift

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mahindra XUV 3XO starts from $21,800 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Swift opens at $16,990. That makes the Suzuki Swift the more affordable entry point by $4,810.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $23,980 and $18,689 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Swift by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mahindra XUV 3XO stands out with Apple CarPlay and wireless charging that you will not find on the Suzuki Swift. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mahindra XUV 3XO uses a Petrol producing 82kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.4 seconds.

The Suzuki Swift responds with a Petrol making 70kW and 130Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels.

The Mahindra XUV 3XO has the clear power advantage at 82kW vs 70kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mahindra XUV 3XO measures 3,990mm long on a 2,600mm wheelbase, 140mm longer than the Suzuki Swift at 3,850mm (2,430mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mahindra XUV 3XO generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 364L in the Mahindra XUV 3XO and 210L in the Suzuki Swift, giving the Mahindra XUV 3XO a 154L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.6m to 10.6m

TightestSuzuki Swift GA ManualTightest turn at 9.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Swift GA Manual
9.6mTighter
Best
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L
10.6m
Worst
Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5L
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Swift GA Manual
9.6m · Excellent

Based on 9.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki SwiftTightest turn at 9.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Mahindra XUV 3XO10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Suzuki SwiftTightest9.6 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,853/year for the Mahindra XUV 3XO and $1,568/year for the Suzuki Swift. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Swift.

Estimated annual total: $1,853 (Mahindra XUV 3XO) vs $1,568 (Suzuki Swift). The Suzuki Swift saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (Mahindra XUV 3XO) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift). The Mahindra XUV 3XO has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mahindra XUV 3XO if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mahindra's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mahindra XUV 3XO takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Suzuki Swift will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mahindra XUV 3XO has a clear edge. The Mahindra XUV 3XO adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mahindra XUV 3XO and Suzuki Swift?

The Suzuki Swift is the cheapest at $16,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mahindra XUV 3XO by $4,810.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Swift uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Suzuki Swift all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO has the largest boot at 364L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO has the longest warranty at 7 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mahindra XUV 3XO makes the most power at 82kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · All Hatchbacks · Best mid-size SUVs · Best family cars