CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG MG3 vs Suzuki Swift
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG MG3 vs Suzuki Swift

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGSuzuki
Price (RRP)$20,990$23,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power81kW59.6kW
0-100 km/h10.8s12.4s
Fuel Economy6 L/100km4 L/100km
Boot Space293L267L
Towing500kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety4 Stars3 Stars

Track the MG MG3 & Suzuki Swift

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The MG MG3 starts from $20,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Swift opens at $23,990. That makes the MG MG3 the more affordable entry point by $3,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $23,089 and $26,389 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Swift by roughly $2,850 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

The MG MG3 holds a 4-star ANCAP rating vs 3 stars for the Suzuki Swift. Adult occupant protection scored 74% for the MG MG3 and 67% for the Suzuki Swift.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 5 of 10 key ADAS systems on the MG MG3, against 4 on the Suzuki Swift.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the MG MG3 and 6 in the Suzuki Swift.

Feature Showdown

The MG MG3 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Swift gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG MG3 stands out with power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the Suzuki Swift. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MG MG3 uses a Petrol producing 81kW and 142Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.8 seconds.

The Suzuki Swift responds with a Petrol making 59.6kW and 109Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.4 seconds.

The MG MG3 has the clear power advantage at 81kW vs 59.6kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the MG MG3 is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG MG3 measures 4,113mm long on a 2,570mm wheelbase, 253mm longer than the Suzuki Swift at 3,860mm (2,450mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG MG3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 293L in the MG MG3 and 267L in the Suzuki Swift, giving the MG MG3 a 26L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 10.2m

TightestSuzuki Swift GLTightest turn at 9.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Swift GL
9.8mTighter
Best
MG MG3 Vibe
10.2m
Worst
MG3 Vibe
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Swift GL
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki SwiftTightest turn at 9.8m, needs the least road to swing around
MG MG310.2 m
Good△ 3-point
Suzuki SwiftTightest9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the MG MG3 and $1,140/year for the Suzuki Swift. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Swift.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG MG3) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift). The MG MG3 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG MG3 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG MG3 takes 7 of 8 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki Swift will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. The MG MG3 adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG MG3 and Suzuki Swift?

The MG MG3 is the cheapest at $20,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Swift by $3,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Swift uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The MG MG3 has the highest ANCAP rating at 4 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG MG3 has the largest boot at 293L.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG MG3 has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG MG3 makes the most power at 81kW. The MG MG3 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.8s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons
Read our in-depth MG MG3 vs Suzuki Swift analysis

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars