Mazda Mazda2 vs Suzuki Swift
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 12 Sep 2026, price 28 Oct 2026
Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$26,990RRP
- no option data for this car
$23,990RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Mazda Mazda2 & Suzuki Swift
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda Mazda2 starts from $26,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Swift opens at $23,990. That makes the Suzuki Swift the more affordable entry point by $3,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $29,689 and $26,389 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Swift by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP's published record does not give the Mazda Mazda2 a rating. With no pair of ratings to compare, the active-safety features in the spec table above are the fairer comparison.
Recalls on our record
Mazda Mazda2
- REC-005009 · published 2 Dec 2021The low pressure fuel pump impeller may become deformed and cause the fuel pump to stop working.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2019
- REC-000892 · published 27 Sep 2019The vehicle's fuel tank may exceed the specified manufacturing dimensions and place additional strain on the fuel tank retaining strap, which may weaken or potentially break.Year range on the notice: 2018 - 2019
- REC-000875 · published 11 Feb 2018On some vehicles, the shape of the teeth on the parking brake sector gear may not meet specification.Year range on the notice: 2016 - 2018
- 4 more on the model page.
Suzuki Swift
- REC-006262 · published 5 Feb 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the steering shaft nut may not be tightened to specifications.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023
- REC-006259 · published 5 Feb 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the steering shaft nut may not be tightened to specifications.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023
- REC-001268 · published 13 Jun 2019Side airbags, curtain airbags and seatbelt pretensioner may be inadvertently deployed when the rear door is slammed shut.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2019
- 10 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda Mazda2 features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Suzuki Swift gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda Mazda2 stands out with Apple CarPlay and head-up display — features our data doesn't list for the Suzuki Swift. The Suzuki Swift counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Mazda Mazda2 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Suzuki Swift offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Mazda Mazda2 uses a Petrol producing 81kW and 142Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Suzuki Swift responds with a Petrol making 59.6kW and 109Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.4 seconds.
The Mazda Mazda2 has the clear power advantage at 81kW vs 59.6kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mazda Mazda2 is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda Mazda2 measures 4,360mm long on a 2,570mm wheelbase, 500mm longer than the Suzuki Swift at 3,860mm (2,450mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda2 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 440L in the Mazda Mazda2 and 267L in the Suzuki Swift, giving the Mazda Mazda2 a 173L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.8m to 9.8m
Based on 9.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 9.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,425/year for the Mazda Mazda2 and $1,140/year for the Suzuki Swift. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Swift.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda2) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift). The Mazda Mazda2 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda Mazda2 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Mazda Mazda2: Top CarSorted Score, 73 vs 72, but the Suzuki Swift is $3,000 cheaper
The Mazda Mazda2 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (73 vs 72), taking 4 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: performance (Mazda Mazda2 ahead by 12), reliability (Mazda Mazda2 ahead by 12), safety (Suzuki Swift ahead by 9). The Suzuki Swift will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda Mazda2 has a clear edge. The Mazda Mazda2 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda Mazda2 and Suzuki Swift?
The Suzuki Swift is the cheapest at $23,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda Mazda2 by $3,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Swift uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Suzuki Swift holds a 3-star ANCAP rating. ANCAP's published record does not give a rating to Mazda Mazda2, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda Mazda2 has the largest boot at 440L with the seats up.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mazda Mazda2 has the longest warranty at 5 years / unlimited km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda Mazda2 makes the most power at 81kW. The Mazda Mazda2 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
