CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda Mazda2 vs Suzuki Swift
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda Mazda2 vs Suzuki Swift

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Suzuki Swift: we're still completing 0-100km/h, braked towing and CO2 emissions.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMazdaSuzuki
Price (RRP)$20,495$16,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power76kW70kW
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km5.5 L/100km
Boot Space250L210L
Towing700kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Mazda Mazda2 & Suzuki Swift

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda Mazda2 starts from $20,495 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Swift opens at $16,990. That makes the Suzuki Swift the more affordable entry point by $3,505.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $22,545 and $18,689 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Swift by roughly $1,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda Mazda2 and Suzuki Swift hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 0 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda Mazda2 and 7 in the Suzuki Swift.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

Drivetrain

The Mazda Mazda2 uses a 1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16-valve DOHC S-VT producing 76kW and 135Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout.

The Suzuki Swift responds with a Petrol making 70kW and 130Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels.

The Mazda Mazda2 has the clear power advantage at 76kW vs 70kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda Mazda2 measures 3,900mm long on a 2,490mm wheelbase, 50mm longer than the Suzuki Swift at 3,850mm (2,430mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda2 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 250L in the Mazda Mazda2 and 210L in the Suzuki Swift, giving the Mazda Mazda2 a 40L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.6m to 9.8m

TightestSuzuki Swift GA ManualTightest turn at 9.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Swift GA Manual
9.6mTighter
Best
Mazda Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 Manual
9.8m
Worst
Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 Manual
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Swift GA Manual
9.6m · Excellent

Based on 9.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki SwiftTightest turn at 9.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda Mazda29.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Suzuki SwiftTightest9.6 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Mazda Mazda2 and $1,568/year for the Suzuki Swift. That is a $256 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Swift.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Mazda Mazda2) vs $1,568 (Suzuki Swift). The Suzuki Swift saves you roughly $256 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years (Mazda Mazda2) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda Mazda2 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mazda Mazda2 and Suzuki Swift trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Suzuki Swift will save you roughly $256 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda Mazda2 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda Mazda2 and Suzuki Swift?

The Suzuki Swift is the cheapest at $16,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda Mazda2 by $3,505.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Swift uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda Mazda2 and Suzuki Swift all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda Mazda2 has the largest boot at 250L.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda Mazda2 makes the most power at 76kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchs · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars