CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda Mazda2 vs Skoda Fabia
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda Mazda2 vs Skoda Fabia

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaSkoda
Price (RRP)$20,495$27,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power76kW85kW
0-100 km/h9.7s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km5 L/100km
Boot Space250L380L
Towing700kg750kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Mazda Mazda2 & Skoda Fabia

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda Mazda2 starts from $20,495 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Fabia opens at $27,990. That makes the Mazda Mazda2 the more affordable entry point by $7,495.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $22,490 for the Mazda Mazda2 and $29,990 for the Skoda Fabia.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Fabia by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Skoda Fabia counters with Apple CarPlay that the Mazda Mazda2 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda Mazda2 uses a 1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16-valve DOHC S-VT producing 76kW and 135Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout.

The Skoda Fabia responds with a Petrol making 85kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.7 seconds.

The Skoda Fabia has the clear power advantage at 85kW vs 76kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda Mazda2 measures 3,900mm long on a 2,490mm wheelbase, 208mm shorter than the Skoda Fabia at 4,108mm (2,564mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Fabia generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 250L in the Mazda Mazda2 and 380L in the Skoda Fabia, giving the Skoda Fabia a 130L advantage.

For towing, the Skoda Fabia leads with a 750kg braked capacity vs 700kg. That 50kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 10.7m

TightestMazda Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 ManualTightest turn at 9.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 Manual
9.8mTighter
Best
Skoda Fabia
10.7m
Worst
Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 Manual
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Fabia
10.7m · Good

Based on 10.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda Mazda2Tightest turn at 9.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda Mazda2Tightest9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Skoda Fabia10.7 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Mazda Mazda2 and $1,425/year for the Skoda Fabia. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Fabia.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Mazda Mazda2) vs $1,425 (Skoda Fabia). The Skoda Fabia saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years (Mazda Mazda2) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Fabia). The Skoda Fabia has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda Mazda2 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Fabia if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Fabia takes 5 of 6 key spec categories. The Skoda Fabia will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Fabia has a clear edge. The Skoda Fabia adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda Mazda2 and Skoda Fabia?

The Mazda Mazda2 is the cheapest at $20,495 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Fabia by $7,495.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Fabia uses the least fuel at 5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda Mazda2 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Fabia has the largest boot at 380L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Fabia has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Skoda Fabia makes the most power at 85kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchs · Best family cars