MG ZS vs Suzuki Swift
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the MG ZS & Suzuki Swift
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The MG ZS starts from $22,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Swift opens at $16,990. That makes the Suzuki Swift the more affordable entry point by $6,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $25,289 and $18,689 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Swift by roughly $1,710 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the MG ZS and Suzuki Swift hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MG ZS packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Suzuki Swift.
Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 7 in the MG ZS and 7 in the Suzuki Swift.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The MG ZS stands out with Apple CarPlay and power tailgate that you will not find on the Suzuki Swift. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The MG ZS uses a Petrol producing 81kW and 140Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout.
The Suzuki Swift responds with a Petrol making 70kW and 130Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels.
The MG ZS has the clear power advantage at 81kW vs 70kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The MG ZS measures 4,430mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 580mm longer than the Suzuki Swift at 3,850mm (2,430mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG ZS generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 443L in the MG ZS and 210L in the Suzuki Swift, giving the MG ZS a 233L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.6m to 11.0m
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 9.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the MG ZS and $1,568/year for the Suzuki Swift. That is a $342 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Swift.
Estimated annual total: $1,910 (MG ZS) vs $1,568 (Suzuki Swift). The Suzuki Swift saves you roughly $342 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG ZS) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift). The MG ZS has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the MG ZS if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The MG ZS takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Suzuki Swift will save you roughly $342 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG ZS has a clear edge. The MG ZS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, MG ZS and Suzuki Swift?
The Suzuki Swift is the cheapest at $16,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG ZS by $6,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Swift uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — MG ZS and Suzuki Swift all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The MG ZS has the largest boot at 443L.
Which has the best warranty?
The MG ZS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The MG ZS makes the most power at 81kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
