CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGAC Emzoom vs MG ZS
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GAC Emzoom vs MG ZS

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGACMG
Price (RRP)$25,590$22,990
Power125kW81kW
0-100 km/h7.8s9.9s
Fuel Economy6.6 L/100km6.7 L/100km
Boot Space341L359L
Towing1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 150k km10yr / 250k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The GAC Emzoom starts from $25,590 before on-road costs, while the MG ZS opens at $22,990. That makes the MG ZS the more affordable entry point by $2,600.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $28,149 and $25,289 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the GAC Emzoom and MG ZS hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GAC Emzoom packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the MG ZS.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GAC Emzoom and 7 in the MG ZS.

Feature Showdown

The GAC Emzoom features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the MG ZS gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GAC Emzoom stands out with wireless charging, panoramic roof and ambient lighting that you will not find on the MG ZS. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the GAC Emzoom gets synthetic leather upholstery while the MG ZS offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the GAC Emzoom and 1-zone in the MG ZS.

Drivetrain

The GAC Emzoom uses a Petrol Turbo producing 125kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.8 seconds.

The MG ZS responds with a Petrol making 81kW and 140Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.9 seconds.

The GAC Emzoom has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 81kW. In the real-world sprint, the GAC Emzoom is 2.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GAC Emzoom measures 4,410mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 20mm shorter than the MG ZS at 4,430mm (2,610mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Emzoom generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 341L in the GAC Emzoom and 359L in the MG ZS, giving the MG ZS a 18L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.2m

MG ZS Vibe
11.0mTighter
Best
GAC Emzoom Luxury
11.2m
Worst
GAC Emzoom
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
MG ZS
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the GAC Emzoom and $1,910/year for the MG ZS. That is a $29 annual difference in favour of the GAC Emzoom.

Estimated annual total: $1,881 (GAC Emzoom) vs $1,910 (MG ZS). The GAC Emzoom saves you roughly $29 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 150,000km (GAC Emzoom) vs 10 years / 250,000km (MG ZS). The MG ZS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GAC Emzoom if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG ZS if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG ZS takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The GAC Emzoom will save you roughly $29 a year in fuel. The MG ZS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GAC Emzoom and MG ZS?

The MG ZS is the cheapest at $22,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GAC Emzoom by $2,600.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GAC Emzoom uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — GAC Emzoom and MG ZS all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG ZS has the largest boot at 359L.

Which can tow the most?

The MG ZS has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG ZS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Emzoom makes the most power at 125kW. The GAC Emzoom is quickest to 100km/h in 7.8s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs