MG ZS vs Skoda Yeti
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
MG ZS
From $22,990
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
81kW
6.7 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
443L
Skoda Yeti
$23,490 when new
RRP when new — this model is no longer sold new in Australia
SUV
Petrol
4 cylinder inline turbocharged engine with high pressure direct injection
77kW
6 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
321L
Skoda Yeti: we're still completing kerb weight, ground clearance and turning circle.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the MG ZS & Skoda Yeti
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The MG ZS starts from $22,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Yeti opens at $23,490. That makes the MG ZS the more affordable entry point by $500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $25,289 and $25,839 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Yeti by roughly $1,000 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The MG ZS stands out with Apple CarPlay and power tailgate — features our data doesn't list for the Skoda Yeti. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the MG ZS gets cloth upholstery while the Skoda Yeti offers fabric.
Drivetrain
The MG ZS uses a Petrol producing 81kW and 140Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout.
The Skoda Yeti responds with a 4 cylinder inline turbocharged engine with high pressure direct injection making 77kW and 175Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.4 seconds.
The MG ZS has the clear power advantage at 81kW vs 77kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The MG ZS measures 4,430mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 207mm longer than the Skoda Yeti at 4,223mm (2,578mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG ZS generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 443L in the MG ZS and 321L in the Skoda Yeti, giving the MG ZS a 122L advantage.
For towing, the Skoda Yeti leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 500kg. That 700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m diameter
Good
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Good
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.7 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.8 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the MG ZS and $1,710/year for the Skoda Yeti. That is a $200 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Yeti.
Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG ZS) vs 3 years / 999,999km (Skoda Yeti). The MG ZS has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the MG ZS if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Skoda Yeti if: You want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The MG ZS takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Skoda Yeti will save you roughly $200 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG ZS has a clear edge. The MG ZS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, MG ZS and Skoda Yeti?
The MG ZS is the cheapest at $22,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Yeti by $500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Skoda Yeti uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
MG ZS holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Skoda Yeti, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The MG ZS has the largest boot at 443L.
Which can tow the most?
The Skoda Yeti has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The MG ZS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The MG ZS makes the most power at 81kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
