Suzuki Swift vs Mazda Mazda2
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Suzuki Swift
From $16,990
Hatchback
Petrol
Petrol
70kW
5.5 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
210L
Mazda Mazda2
From $20,495
Hatchback
Petrol
1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16-valve DOHC S-VT
76kW
6.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
250L
Track the Suzuki Swift & Mazda Mazda2
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki Swift starts from $16,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda Mazda2 opens at $20,495. That makes the Suzuki Swift the more affordable entry point by $3,505.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $18,689 and $22,545 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Swift by roughly $1,280 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Suzuki Swift and Mazda Mazda2 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 0 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 7 in the Suzuki Swift and 6 in the Mazda Mazda2.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki Swift uses a Petrol producing 70kW and 130Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout.
The Mazda Mazda2 responds with a 1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16-valve DOHC S-VT making 76kW and 135Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels.
The Mazda Mazda2 has the clear power advantage at 76kW vs 70kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki Swift measures 3,850mm long on a 2,430mm wheelbase, 50mm shorter than the Mazda Mazda2 at 3,900mm (2,490mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda2 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 210L in the Suzuki Swift and 250L in the Mazda Mazda2, giving the Mazda Mazda2 a 40L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 533L vs 469L.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.6m to 9.8m
Based on 9.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 9.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,568/year for the Suzuki Swift and $1,824/year for the Mazda Mazda2. That is a $256 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Swift.
Estimated annual total: $1,568 (Suzuki Swift) vs $1,824 (Mazda Mazda2). The Suzuki Swift saves you roughly $256 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift) vs 3 years (Mazda Mazda2). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda Mazda2 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Suzuki Swift and Mazda Mazda2 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Suzuki Swift will save you roughly $256 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda Mazda2 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Suzuki Swift and Mazda Mazda2?
The Suzuki Swift is the cheapest at $16,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda Mazda2 by $3,505.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Swift uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Suzuki Swift and Mazda Mazda2 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda Mazda2 has the largest boot at 250L.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda Mazda2 makes the most power at 76kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
