CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSuzuki Swift vs Mazda Mazda2
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Swift vs Mazda Mazda2

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSuzukiMazda
Price (RRP)$23,990$22,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power59.6kW81kW
0-100 km/h12.4s10.5s
Fuel Economy4 L/100km5 L/100km
Boot Space267L250L
Towing900kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety3 StarsNo data

Track the Suzuki Swift & Mazda Mazda2

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki Swift starts from $23,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda Mazda2 opens at $22,990. That makes the Mazda Mazda2 the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $26,389 and $25,289 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Swift by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Suzuki Swift features a 9-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda Mazda2 gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Swift uses a Petrol producing 59.6kW and 109Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12.4 seconds.

The Mazda Mazda2 responds with a Petrol making 81kW and 142Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.

The Mazda Mazda2 has the clear power advantage at 81kW vs 59.6kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Mazda Mazda2 is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Swift measures 3,860mm long on a 2,450mm wheelbase, 225mm shorter than the Mazda Mazda2 at 4,085mm (2,570mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda2 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 267L in the Suzuki Swift and 250L in the Mazda Mazda2, giving the Suzuki Swift a 17L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 9.8m

TightestSuzuki Swift GLTightest turn at 9.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Swift GL
9.8mTighter
Best
Mazda Mazda2 G15 Evolve Hatch
9.8m
Best
Suzuki Swift GL
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda2 G15 Evolve Hatch
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki SwiftTightest turn at 9.8m, needs the least road to swing around
Suzuki SwiftTightest9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Mazda Mazda29.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,140/year for the Suzuki Swift and $1,425/year for the Mazda Mazda2. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Swift.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda2). The Mazda Mazda2 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda2 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda Mazda2 takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki Swift will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. The Mazda Mazda2 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki Swift and Mazda Mazda2?

The Mazda Mazda2 is the cheapest at $22,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Swift by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Swift uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Suzuki Swift holds a 3-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mazda Mazda2, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Suzuki Swift has the largest boot at 267L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mazda Mazda2 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda Mazda2 makes the most power at 81kW. The Mazda Mazda2 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best hybrid cars · Best family cars