CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 4 vs Mazda Mazda2
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 4 vs Mazda Mazda2

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryMazda
Price (RRP)$21,750$20,495
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power108kW76kW
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space380L250L
Towing700kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Chery Tiggo 4 & Mazda Mazda2

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 starts from $21,750 before on-road costs, while the Mazda Mazda2 opens at $20,495. That makes the Mazda Mazda2 the more affordable entry point by $1,255.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $23,990 for the Chery Tiggo 4 and $22,490 for the Mazda Mazda2.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda Mazda2 by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery Tiggo 4 and Mazda Mazda2 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 4 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Mazda Mazda2.

Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 6 in the Mazda Mazda2.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Chery Tiggo 4 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Mazda Mazda2. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 4 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout.

The Mazda Mazda2 responds with a 1.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16-valve DOHC S-VT making 76kW and 135Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels.

The Chery Tiggo 4 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 76kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 4 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 407mm longer than the Mazda Mazda2 at 3,900mm (2,490mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 380L in the Chery Tiggo 4 and 250L in the Mazda Mazda2, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 a 130L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m diameter

Excellent

Mazda Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 Manual
9.8m
Mazda2 Genki Hatch 1.5 Manual
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8 m Ø

Excellent

9.0 m road
Mazda Mazda2 Turning circle · Ø 9.8 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Clears the U-turn in one swing

Needs about 8.6 m of road; you have 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.7 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 and $1,824/year for the Mazda Mazda2. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Mazda Mazda2.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Chery Tiggo 4) vs $1,824 (Mazda Mazda2). The Mazda Mazda2 saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4) vs 3 years (Mazda Mazda2). The Chery Tiggo 4 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda2 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 4 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Mazda Mazda2 will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 4 has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 4 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 4 and Mazda Mazda2?

The Mazda Mazda2 is the cheapest at $20,495 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 4 by $1,255.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda Mazda2 uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 4 and Mazda Mazda2 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 4 has the largest boot at 380L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Tiggo 4 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 4 makes the most power at 108kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · All Hatchs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best family cars