CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai Kona vs Mitsubishi ASX
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai Kona vs Mitsubishi ASX

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHyundaiMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$32,500$37,740
Power110kW113kW
0-100 km/h9.9s11.9s
Fuel Economy6.6 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space361L350L
Towing1,300kg1,200kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Hyundai Kona starts from $32,500 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi ASX opens at $37,740. That makes the Hyundai Kona the more affordable entry point by $5,240.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $35,750 and $41,514 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Hyundai Kona and Mitsubishi ASX hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 80% for the Hyundai Kona and 76% for the Mitsubishi ASX.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mitsubishi ASX packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 2 in the Hyundai Kona.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Hyundai Kona and 7 in the Mitsubishi ASX.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai Kona features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mitsubishi ASX gets a 10.4-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai Kona uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 180Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.9 seconds.

The Mitsubishi ASX responds with a Petrol making 113kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.9 seconds.

The Mitsubishi ASX has the clear power advantage at 113kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Hyundai Kona is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai Kona measures 4,350mm long on a 2,660mm wheelbase, 80mm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX at 4,270mm (2,634mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai Kona generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 361L in the Hyundai Kona and 350L in the Mitsubishi ASX, giving the Hyundai Kona a 11L advantage.

For towing, the Hyundai Kona leads with a 1,300kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.6m

Mitsubishi ASX LS
10.4mTighter
Best
Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6m
Worst
Hyundai Kona
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi ASX
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the Hyundai Kona and $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi ASX.

Estimated annual total: $1,881 (Hyundai Kona) vs $1,824 (Mitsubishi ASX). The Mitsubishi ASX saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Hyundai Kona takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi ASX will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai Kona and Mitsubishi ASX?

The Hyundai Kona is the cheapest at $32,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi ASX by $5,240.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi ASX uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Hyundai Kona and Mitsubishi ASX all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai Kona has the largest boot at 361L.

Which can tow the most?

The Hyundai Kona has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi ASX makes the most power at 113kW. The Hyundai Kona is quickest to 100km/h in 9.9s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs