CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi ASX vs Toyota C-HR
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi ASX vs Toyota C-HR

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiToyota
Price (RRP)$37,740$38,990
Power113kW112kW
0-100 km/h11.9s8.2s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km4.7 L/100km
Boot Space350L318L
Towing1,200kg1,200kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi ASX starts from $37,740 before on-road costs, while the Toyota C-HR opens at $38,990. That makes the Mitsubishi ASX the more affordable entry point by $1,250.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,514 and $42,889 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota C-HR by roughly $2,420 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mitsubishi ASX and Toyota C-HR hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 76% for the Mitsubishi ASX and 85% for the Toyota C-HR.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota C-HR packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mitsubishi ASX.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mitsubishi ASX and 7 in the Toyota C-HR.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi ASX features a 10.4-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota C-HR gets a 10.5-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi ASX stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi ASX uses a Petrol producing 113kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.9 seconds.

The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 112kW and 188Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.2 seconds.

The Mitsubishi ASX has the clear power advantage at 113kW vs 112kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota C-HR is 3.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi ASX measures 4,270mm long on a 2,634mm wheelbase, 90mm shorter than the Toyota C-HR at 4,360mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota C-HR generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 350L in the Mitsubishi ASX and 318L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the Mitsubishi ASX a 32L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota C-HR leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.4m

Mitsubishi ASX LS
10.4mTighter
Best
Toyota C-HR GXL
10.4m
Best
Mitsubishi ASX
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota C-HR
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX and $1,340/year for the Toyota C-HR. That is a $484 annual difference in favour of the Toyota C-HR.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Mitsubishi ASX) vs $1,340 (Toyota C-HR). The Toyota C-HR saves you roughly $484 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi ASX takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Toyota C-HR will save you roughly $484 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi ASX has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs