Toyota C-HR vs Suzuki Vitara
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Toyota C-HR starts from $38,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Vitara opens at $38,490. That makes the Suzuki Vitara the more affordable entry point by $500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $42,889 and $42,339 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota C-HR by roughly $1,565 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Toyota C-HR and Suzuki Vitara hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Toyota C-HR and 77% for the Suzuki Vitara.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Toyota C-HR and 6 in the Suzuki Vitara.
Feature Showdown
The Toyota C-HR features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Vitara gets a 9-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Suzuki Vitara counters with wireless charging that the Toyota C-HR does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Toyota C-HR gets cloth upholstery while the Suzuki Vitara offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Toyota C-HR and 1-zone in the Suzuki Vitara.
Drivetrain
The Toyota C-HR uses a Petrol producing 103kW and 188Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.2 seconds.
The Suzuki Vitara responds with a Petrol making 95kW and 220Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.
The Toyota C-HR has the clear power advantage at 103kW vs 95kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota C-HR is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Toyota C-HR measures 4,360mm long on a 2,640mm wheelbase, 185mm longer than the Suzuki Vitara at 4,175mm (2,500mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota C-HR generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 388L in the Toyota C-HR and 375L in the Suzuki Vitara, giving the Toyota C-HR a 13L advantage.
For towing, the Suzuki Vitara leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 475kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.2m to 10.4m
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,340/year for the Toyota C-HR and $1,653/year for the Suzuki Vitara. That is a $313 annual difference in favour of the Toyota C-HR.
Estimated annual total: $1,340 (Toyota C-HR) vs $1,653 (Suzuki Vitara). The Toyota C-HR saves you roughly $313 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Vitara). The Toyota C-HR has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Vitara if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Toyota C-HR takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. The Toyota C-HR will save you roughly $313 a year in fuel. The Toyota C-HR adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Toyota C-HR and Suzuki Vitara?
The Suzuki Vitara is the cheapest at $38,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota C-HR by $500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4.7L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Toyota C-HR and Suzuki Vitara all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Toyota C-HR has the largest boot at 388L.
Which can tow the most?
The Suzuki Vitara has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Toyota C-HR has the longest warranty at 5 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Toyota C-HR makes the most power at 103kW. The Toyota C-HR is quickest to 100km/h in 8.2s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
