Suzuki Vitara vs Mitsubishi ASX
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki Vitara starts from $38,490 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi ASX opens at $37,740. That makes the Mitsubishi ASX the more affordable entry point by $750.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $42,339 and $41,514 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
The Suzuki Vitara holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Mitsubishi ASX.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Suzuki Vitara packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mitsubishi ASX.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Suzuki Vitara and 7 in the Mitsubishi ASX.
Feature Showdown
The Suzuki Vitara features a 9-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi ASX gets a 10.4-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Suzuki Vitara stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and wireless charging that you will not find on the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Suzuki Vitara gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Mitsubishi ASX offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki Vitara uses a Petrol producing 95kW and 220Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.2 seconds.
The Mitsubishi ASX responds with a Petrol making 113kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.9 seconds.
The Mitsubishi ASX has the clear power advantage at 113kW vs 95kW. In the real-world sprint, the Suzuki Vitara is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki Vitara measures 4,175mm long on a 2,500mm wheelbase, 95mm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX at 4,270mm (2,634mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi ASX generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 375L in the Suzuki Vitara and 350L in the Mitsubishi ASX, giving the Suzuki Vitara a 25L advantage.
For towing, the Mitsubishi ASX leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.2m to 10.4m
Based on 10.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,653/year for the Suzuki Vitara and $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Vitara.
Estimated annual total: $1,653 (Suzuki Vitara) vs $1,824 (Mitsubishi ASX). The Suzuki Vitara saves you roughly $171 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Vitara) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki Vitara if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Suzuki Vitara takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Suzuki Vitara will save you roughly $171 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Suzuki Vitara and Mitsubishi ASX?
The Mitsubishi ASX is the cheapest at $37,740 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Vitara by $750.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Vitara uses the least fuel at 5.8L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The Suzuki Vitara has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The Suzuki Vitara has the largest boot at 375L.
Which can tow the most?
The Suzuki Vitara has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Mitsubishi ASX has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mitsubishi ASX makes the most power at 113kW. The Suzuki Vitara is quickest to 100km/h in 10.2s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
