CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi ASX vs Suzuki Jimny
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi ASX vs Suzuki Jimny

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiSuzuki
Price (RRP)$37,740$36,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power113kW75kW
0-100 km/h11.9s12.4s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Boot Space484L377L
Towing1,200kg1,300kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety4 StarsNo data

Track the Mitsubishi ASX & Suzuki Jimny

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi ASX starts from $37,740 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Jimny opens at $36,990. That makes the Suzuki Jimny the more affordable entry point by $750.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,514 and $40,689 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi ASX features a 10.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Jimny gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi ASX uses a Petrol producing 113kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.9 seconds.

The Suzuki Jimny responds with a Petrol making 75kW and 130Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.4 seconds.

The Mitsubishi ASX has the clear power advantage at 113kW vs 75kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi ASX measures 4,238mm long on a 2,639mm wheelbase, 588mm longer than the Suzuki Jimny at 3,650mm (2,250mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi ASX generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 484L in the Mitsubishi ASX and 377L in the Suzuki Jimny, giving the Mitsubishi ASX a 107L advantage. The Mitsubishi ASX seats 5 vs 4.

For towing, the Suzuki Jimny leads with a 1,300kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.0m to 11.1m

TightestSuzuki Jimny GLXTightest turn at 10.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Jimny GLX
10.0mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi ASX LS
11.1m
Worst
Mitsubishi ASX LS
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Jimny GLX
10.0m · Good

Based on 10.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki JimnyTightest turn at 10.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Mitsubishi ASX11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Suzuki JimnyTightest10.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX and $1,967/year for the Suzuki Jimny. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi ASX.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Mitsubishi ASX) vs $1,967 (Suzuki Jimny). The Mitsubishi ASX saves you roughly $143 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Jimny). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Jimny if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi ASX takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. The Mitsubishi ASX will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi ASX has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki Jimny?

The Suzuki Jimny is the cheapest at $36,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi ASX by $750.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi ASX uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi ASX all hold a 4-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the largest boot at 484L.

Which can tow the most?

The Suzuki Jimny has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi ASX makes the most power at 113kW. The Mitsubishi ASX is quickest to 100km/h in 11.9s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs