CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi ASX vs Nissan X-Trail
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi ASX vs Nissan X-Trail

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiNissan
Price (RRP)$37,740$28,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power113kW102kW
0-100 km/h11.9s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km8.5 L/100km
Boot Space484L
Towing1,200kg1,500kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety4 StarsNo data

Track the Mitsubishi ASX & Nissan X-Trail

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi ASX starts from $37,740 before on-road costs, while the Nissan X-Trail opens at $28,490. That makes the Nissan X-Trail the more affordable entry point by $9,250.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,514 and $31,339 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi ASX by roughly $2,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mitsubishi ASX stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Nissan X-Trail. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi ASX uses a Petrol producing 113kW and 270Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.9 seconds.

The Nissan X-Trail responds with a Petrol making 102kW and 198Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual driving the rear wheels.

The Mitsubishi ASX has the clear power advantage at 113kW vs 102kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi ASX measures 4,238mm long on a 2,639mm wheelbase, 397mm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail at 4,635mm (2,630mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi ASX generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Nissan X-Trail leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.1m

TightestNissan X-Trail ST 2.0 2WD ManualTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Nissan X-Trail ST 2.0 2WD Manual
11.0mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi ASX LS
11.1m
Worst
Mitsubishi ASX LS
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Nissan X-Trail ST 2.0 2WD Manual
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestNissan X-TrailTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Mitsubishi ASX11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Nissan X-TrailTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX and $2,423/year for the Nissan X-Trail. That is a $599 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi ASX.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Mitsubishi ASX) vs $2,423 (Nissan X-Trail). The Mitsubishi ASX saves you roughly $599 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Nissan X-Trail). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: —6yr (Nissan X-Trail).

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan X-Trail if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi ASX takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Mitsubishi ASX will save you roughly $599 a year in fuel. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mitsubishi ASX and Nissan X-Trail?

The Nissan X-Trail is the cheapest at $28,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi ASX by $9,250.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi ASX uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mitsubishi ASX all hold a 4-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Nissan X-Trail has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mitsubishi ASX makes the most power at 113kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs