CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan X-Trail vs Suzuki Jimny
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan X-Trail vs Suzuki Jimny

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecNissanSuzuki
Price (RRP)$38,140$36,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power135kW75kW
0-100 km/h8s12.4s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Boot Space205L377L
Towing2,000kg1,300kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Nissan X-Trail & Suzuki Jimny

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Nissan X-Trail starts from $38,140 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Jimny opens at $36,990. That makes the Suzuki Jimny the more affordable entry point by $1,150.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,954 and $40,689 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Nissan X-Trail features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Jimny gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Nissan X-Trail lines up producing 135kW and 244Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8 seconds.

The Suzuki Jimny responds with a Petrol making 75kW and 130Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.4 seconds.

The Nissan X-Trail has the clear power advantage at 135kW vs 75kW. In the real-world sprint, the Nissan X-Trail is 4.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan X-Trail measures 4,680mm long on a 2,705mm wheelbase, 1030mm longer than the Suzuki Jimny at 3,650mm (2,250mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan X-Trail generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 205L in the Nissan X-Trail and 377L in the Suzuki Jimny, giving the Suzuki Jimny a 172L advantage. The Nissan X-Trail seats 5 vs 4.

For towing, the Nissan X-Trail leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.0m to 11.1m

TightestSuzuki Jimny GLXTightest turn at 10.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Jimny GLX
10.0mTighter
Best
Nissan X-Trail ST 2WD 5-seat
11.1m
Worst
Nissan X-Trail ST 2WD 5-seat
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Jimny GLX
10.0m · Good

Based on 10.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki JimnyTightest turn at 10.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Nissan X-Trail11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Suzuki JimnyTightest10.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Nissan X-Trail and $1,967/year for the Suzuki Jimny. That is a $142 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Jimny.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Nissan X-Trail) vs $1,967 (Suzuki Jimny). The Suzuki Jimny saves you roughly $142 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan X-Trail) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Jimny). The Nissan X-Trail has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan X-Trail if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Jimny if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Nissan X-Trail takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Suzuki Jimny will save you roughly $142 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Suzuki Jimny has a clear edge. The Nissan X-Trail adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan X-Trail and Suzuki Jimny?

The Suzuki Jimny is the cheapest at $36,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan X-Trail by $1,150.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Jimny uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Nissan X-Trail all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Suzuki Jimny has the largest boot at 377L.

Which can tow the most?

The Nissan X-Trail has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Nissan X-Trail has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan X-Trail makes the most power at 135kW. The Nissan X-Trail is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs