CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai Kona vs Toyota FJ Cruiser
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai Kona vs Toyota FJ Cruiser

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Toyota FJ Cruiser: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h, ground clearance, turning circle and CO2 emissions.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecHyundaiToyota
Price (RRP)$33,700TBC
Fuel typePetrolPremium unleaded
Power110kW200kW
0-100 km/h9.9s
Fuel Economy6.6 L/100km11.4 L/100km
Boot Space361L
Towing1,300kg2,250kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety4 StarsNo data

Track the Hyundai Kona & Toyota FJ Cruiser

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Hyundai Kona stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota FJ Cruiser. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai Kona uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 180Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.9 seconds.

The Toyota FJ Cruiser lines up making 200kW and 380Nm, paired to a 5-speed automatic driving all four wheels.

The Toyota FJ Cruiser has the clear power advantage at 200kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai Kona measures 4,350mm long on a 2,660mm wheelbase, 320mm shorter than the Toyota FJ Cruiser at 4,670mm (2,690mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota FJ Cruiser generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Toyota FJ Cruiser leads with a 2,250kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 950kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6m
Hyundai Kona 2.0 FWD
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Hyundai Kona Turning circle · Ø 10.6 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,881/year for the Hyundai Kona and $3,249/year for the Toyota FJ Cruiser. That is a $1,368 annual difference in favour of the Hyundai Kona.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Toyota FJ Cruiser). The Hyundai Kona has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai Kona if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota FJ Cruiser if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Hyundai Kona and Toyota FJ Cruiser trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Hyundai Kona will save you roughly $1,368 a year in fuel. The Hyundai Kona adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai Kona and Toyota FJ Cruiser?

The Hyundai Kona is the cheapest at $33,700 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Hyundai Kona uses the least fuel at 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Hyundai Kona holds a 4-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Toyota FJ Cruiser, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota FJ Cruiser has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,250kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Hyundai Kona has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota FJ Cruiser makes the most power at 200kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs