CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Hyundai Tucson vs Mazda CX-30
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai Tucson vs Mazda CX-30

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 12 Sep 2026, price 1 Oct 2026

SpecHyundaiMazda
Price (RRP)$39,350$29,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power115kW114kW
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km6.3 L/100km
Measured consumption (AAA)7.9 L/100kmAAA test: the 2023 Hyundai Tucson STD, same engine, drivetrain and gearbox, a different grade6.4 L/100kmAAA test: this grade, 2024 model year
Boot (seats up)539L317L
Towing1,650kg1,200kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Measured rows: Australian Automobile Association Real-World Testing Program (realworld.org.au), the on-road result for the vehicle each test names, shown beside the maker's figures rather than in place of them and never scored. Hyundai Tucson test page Mazda CX-30 test page

Track the Hyundai Tucson & Mazda CX-30

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Hyundai Tucson starts from $39,350 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-30 opens at $29,990. That makes the Mazda CX-30 the more affordable entry point by $9,360.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,285 and $32,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-30 by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Hyundai Tucson

  • REC-006717 · published 3 Sep 2026Due to a software issue, the Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC) and Head-up Display (HUD) information may fail to illuminate the visual vehicle speed, fuel level and other critical safety information.Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2026
  • REC-006678 · published 17 Jul 2026Due to a manufacturing issue, the side airbag sensors may not meet manufacturing specifications.Year range on the notice: 2025
  • REC-006615 · published 29 May 2026Due to a software issue, the Forward Collision Avoidance (FCA) system may continue to apply sudden/unexpected braking even though it is no longer necessary to avoid a collision or reduce impact.Year range on the notice: 2023 - 2026
  • 3 more on the model page.

Mazda CX-30

  • REC-001591 · published 21 Mar 2021The boot's power liftgate may partially lower unexpectedly from the fully opened position when the vehicle is parked facing uphill on a slope in high ambient temperature.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2021

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai Tucson features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 4-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-30 gets a 8.8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai Tucson uses a Petrol producing 115kW and 192Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.

The Mazda CX-30 responds with a Petrol making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels.

The Hyundai Tucson has the clear power advantage at 115kW vs 114kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai Tucson measures 4,640mm long on a 2,755mm wheelbase, 245mm longer than the Mazda CX-30 at 4,395mm (2,655mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Hyundai Tucson generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 539L in the Hyundai Tucson and 317L in the Mazda CX-30, giving the Hyundai Tucson a 222L advantage.

For towing, the Hyundai Tucson leads with a 1,650kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 450kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.8m

TightestMazda CX-30 G20 PureTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6mTighter
Best
Hyundai Tucson Petrol
11.8m
Worst
Hyundai Tucson Petrol
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-30 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda CX-30Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Hyundai Tucson11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Mazda CX-30Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Hyundai Tucson and $1,796/year for the Mazda CX-30. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-30.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Tucson) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-30). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai Tucson if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-30 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Mazda CX-30: Top CarSorted Score, 62 vs 60

The Mazda CX-30 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (62 vs 60), taking 2 of 5 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: fuel economy (Mazda CX-30 ahead by 16), practicality (Hyundai Tucson ahead by 13), value (Mazda CX-30 ahead by 10). The Mazda CX-30 will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Hyundai Tucson has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is the cheapest at $29,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Hyundai Tucson by $9,360.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-30 uses the least fuel at 6.3L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Hyundai Tucson holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mazda CX-30, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Hyundai Tucson has the largest boot at 539L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The Hyundai Tucson has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,650kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Hyundai Tucson makes the most power at 115kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs