CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIsuzu MU-X vs Ford Everest
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu MU-X vs Ford Everest

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecIsuzuFord
Price (RRP)$43,900$59,490
Power120kW154kW
0-100 km/h11s10.1s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km7.2 L/100km
Boot Space311L259L
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Isuzu MU-X starts from $43,900 before on-road costs, while the Ford Everest opens at $59,490. That makes the Isuzu MU-X the more affordable entry point by $15,590.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,290 and $65,439 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Isuzu MU-X by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Isuzu MU-X and Ford Everest hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Isuzu MU-X and 86% for the Ford Everest.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Ford Everest packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Isuzu MU-X.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Isuzu MU-X and 9 in the Ford Everest.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu MU-X features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Ford Everest gets a 10.1-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford Everest counters with wireless charging that the Isuzu MU-X does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu MU-X uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.

The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel Bi-Turbo making 154kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.1 seconds.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 154kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Ford Everest is 0.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu MU-X measures 4,860mm long on a 2,855mm wheelbase, 118mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 311L in the Isuzu MU-X and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Isuzu MU-X a 52L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 2138L vs 1818L. The Isuzu MU-X seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 11.8m

Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Ambiente
11.8m
Worst
Isuzu MU-X
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Everest
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X and $2,052/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu MU-X.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Isuzu MU-X) vs $2,052 (Ford Everest). The Isuzu MU-X saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu MU-X) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). The Isuzu MU-X has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Isuzu MU-X takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Isuzu MU-X will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Isuzu MU-X has a clear edge. The Isuzu MU-X adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs