CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIsuzu MU-X vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Isuzu MU-X vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecIsuzuLand Rover
Price (RRP)$43,900TBC
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power120kW184kW
0-100 km/h11s7.5s
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km7.8 L/100km
Boot Space311L748L
Towing3,500kg2,400kg
Warranty6yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Isuzu MU-X & Land Rover Range Rover Velar

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Isuzu MU-X features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets a 11.4-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar counters with wireless charging, power tailgate, Meridian audio and ambient lighting that the Isuzu MU-X does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Isuzu MU-X gets cloth upholstery while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers leather.

Drivetrain

The Isuzu MU-X uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11 seconds.

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar responds with a 2.0L I4 Turbo Petrol making 184kW and 365Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.5 seconds.

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 3.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Isuzu MU-X measures 4,860mm long on a 2,855mm wheelbase, 63mm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar at 4,797mm (2,874mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Range Rover Velar generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 311L in the Isuzu MU-X and 748L in the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, giving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar a 437L advantage. The Isuzu MU-X seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Isuzu MU-X leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,400kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 11.9m

Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6mTighter
Best
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Dynamic SE P250
11.9m
Worst
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Dynamic SE P250
11.9m · Average

Based on 11.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X and $2,223/year for the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu MU-X.

Estimated annual total: $1,824 (Isuzu MU-X) vs $2,223 (Land Rover Range Rover Velar). The Isuzu MU-X saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu MU-X) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Velar). The Isuzu MU-X has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Velar if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Isuzu MU-X and Land Rover Range Rover Velar trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Isuzu MU-X will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a clear edge. The Isuzu MU-X adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Isuzu MU-X and Land Rover Range Rover Velar?

The Isuzu MU-X is the cheapest at $43,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu MU-X uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Isuzu MU-X all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar has the largest boot at 748L.

Which can tow the most?

The Isuzu MU-X has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Isuzu MU-X has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar makes the most power at 184kW. The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is quickest to 100km/h in 7.5s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs