CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKia Optima vs Toyota Camry
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia Optima vs Toyota Camry

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKiaToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$39,990
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power180kW170kW
0-100 km/h8.1s
Fuel Economy8.5 L/100km4 L/100km
Boot Space510L524L
Towing1,200kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Kia Optima & Toyota Camry

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Kia Optima and Toyota Camry hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Toyota Camry packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Kia Optima.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.

Feature Showdown

The Kia Optima features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota Camry gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments.

The Kia Optima stands out with wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats and Harman/Kardon audio that you will not find on the Toyota Camry. The Toyota Camry counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Kia Optima uses a 2.0L T-GDI turbo producing 180kW and 350Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Toyota Camry responds with a 2.5L 4-cyl Dual VVT-i Hybrid making 170kW and 221Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.1 seconds.

The Kia Optima has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 170kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia Optima measures 4,855mm long on a 2,805mm wheelbase, 65mm shorter than the Toyota Camry at 4,920mm (2,825mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Camry generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 510L in the Kia Optima and 524L in the Toyota Camry, giving the Toyota Camry a 14L advantage.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.9m to 11.2m

TightestKia Optima GTTightest turn at 10.9m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Kia Optima GT
10.9mTighter
Best
Toyota Camry Ascent Hybrid
11.2m
Worst
Kia Optima GT
10.9m · Good

Based on 10.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Camry Ascent Hybrid
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKia OptimaTightest turn at 10.9m, needs the least road to swing around
Kia OptimaTightest10.9 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota Camry11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,423/year for the Kia Optima and $1,140/year for the Toyota Camry. That is a $1,283 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Camry.

Estimated annual total: $2,423 (Kia Optima) vs $1,140 (Toyota Camry). The Toyota Camry saves you roughly $1,283 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Optima) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Camry). The Kia Optima has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia Optima if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Camry if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Kia Optima and Toyota Camry trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Toyota Camry will save you roughly $1,283 a year in fuel. The Kia Optima adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia Optima and Toyota Camry?

The Toyota Camry is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Camry uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Kia Optima and Toyota Camry all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota Camry has the largest boot at 524L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Camry has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Optima has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Kia Optima makes the most power at 180kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars