Kia Picanto vs Mitsubishi Colt
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Kia Picanto
From $19,190
Hatchback
Petrol
Petrol
62kW
5.4 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
255L
Mitsubishi Colt
Price TBC
Hatchback
Petrol
Petrol
77kW
5.9 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
317L
Mitsubishi Colt: we're still completing price, 0-100km/h and braked towing.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the Kia Picanto & Mitsubishi Colt
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Kia Picanto stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Mitsubishi Colt. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Kia Picanto gets cloth upholstery while the Mitsubishi Colt offers cloth (sports bucket seats).
Drivetrain
The Kia Picanto uses a Petrol producing 62kW and 122Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12.2 seconds.
The Mitsubishi Colt responds with a Petrol making 77kW and 141Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving the front wheels.
The Mitsubishi Colt has the clear power advantage at 77kW vs 62kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Kia Picanto measures 3,595mm long on a 2,400mm wheelbase, 305mm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt at 3,900mm (2,500mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Colt generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 255L in the Kia Picanto and 317L in the Mitsubishi Colt, giving the Mitsubishi Colt a 62L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.4m to 9.8m
Based on 9.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 9.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Kia Picanto and $1,682/year for the Mitsubishi Colt. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Kia Picanto.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Picanto) vs 5 years / 130,000km (Mitsubishi Colt). The Kia Picanto has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Kia Picanto if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mitsubishi Colt if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The Kia Picanto and Mitsubishi Colt trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Kia Picanto will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Colt has a clear edge. The Kia Picanto adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Kia Picanto and Mitsubishi Colt?
The Kia Picanto is the cheapest at $19,190 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Kia Picanto uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of Kia Picanto and Mitsubishi Colt carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mitsubishi Colt has the largest boot at 317L.
Which has the best warranty?
The Kia Picanto has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mitsubishi Colt makes the most power at 77kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
