CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKia Picanto vs Mazda Mazda3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia Picanto vs Mazda Mazda3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKiaMazda
Price (RRP)$19,190$26,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power62kW114kW
0-100 km/h12.2s9.7s
Fuel Economy5.4 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space255L295L
Towing1,200kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Kia Picanto & Mazda Mazda3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Kia Picanto starts from $19,190 before on-road costs, while the Mazda Mazda3 opens at $26,490. That makes the Kia Picanto the more affordable entry point by $7,300.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $21,109 and $29,139 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Kia Picanto features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Mazda Mazda3 gets a 8.8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Kia Picanto uses a Petrol producing 62kW and 122Nm of torque, sent through a manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12.2 seconds.

The Mazda Mazda3 responds with a Petrol making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.7 seconds.

The Mazda Mazda3 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 62kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda Mazda3 is 2.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia Picanto measures 3,595mm long on a 2,400mm wheelbase, 865mm shorter than the Mazda Mazda3 at 4,460mm (2,725mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 255L in the Kia Picanto and 295L in the Mazda Mazda3, giving the Mazda Mazda3 a 40L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 10.6m

TightestKia Picanto SportTightest turn at 9.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Kia Picanto Sport
9.4mTighter
Best
Mazda Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m
Worst
Kia Picanto Sport
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKia PicantoTightest turn at 9.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Kia PicantoTightest9.4 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Mazda Mazda310.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,539/year for the Kia Picanto and $1,682/year for the Mazda Mazda3. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Kia Picanto.

Estimated annual total: $1,539 (Kia Picanto) vs $1,682 (Mazda Mazda3). The Kia Picanto saves you roughly $143 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Picanto) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda3). The Kia Picanto has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia Picanto if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda3 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda Mazda3 takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Kia Picanto will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda Mazda3 has a clear edge. The Kia Picanto adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia Picanto and Mazda Mazda3?

The Kia Picanto is the cheapest at $19,190 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda Mazda3 by $7,300.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Kia Picanto uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Kia Picanto and Mazda Mazda3 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda Mazda3 has the largest boot at 295L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda Mazda3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Picanto has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda Mazda3 makes the most power at 114kW. The Mazda Mazda3 is quickest to 100km/h in 9.7s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchs · All Sedans · Best family cars