CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Kia pro_cee'd vs Fiat 500
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Kia pro_cee'd vs Fiat 500

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 4 Sep 2026, price 4 Oct 2026

Specifications in progress

Kia pro_cee'd: we're still completing 0-100km/h, drive type and braked towing.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecKiaFiat
Price (RRP)$29,990$28,900
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power150kW51kW
0-100 km/h—12.9s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km4.8 L/100km
Boot (seats up)380L185L
Warranty7yr / No data3yr / 150k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Kia pro_cee'd & Fiat 500

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Kia pro_cee'd starts from $29,990 before on-road costs, while the Fiat 500 opens at $28,900. That makes the Fiat 500 the more affordable entry point by $1,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,989 and $31,790 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Fiat 500 by roughly $3,705 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Kia pro_cee'd

None open on our record

Fiat 500

  • REC-003875 · published 30 May 2019On affected vehicles the drive axle may break due to a nonconformity in the production process.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • REC-003732 · published 26 Jul 2016Possible non-conformity of the right front seat guide tracks.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • REC-003693 · published 18 Apr 2016There is a potential deviation in the buckle heat treatment process.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Fiat 500 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Kia pro_cee'd uses a 1.6L T-GDi Turbo Petrol producing 150kW and 265Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual to the wheels.

The Fiat 500 responds with a MultiAir Petrol making 51kW and 102Nm, paired to a 5-speed dualogic automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.9 seconds.

The Kia pro_cee'd has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 51kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Kia pro_cee'd measures 4,310mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 739mm longer than the Fiat 500 at 3,571mm (2,300mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia pro_cee'd generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 380L in the Kia pro_cee'd and 185L in the Fiat 500, giving the Kia pro_cee'd a 195L advantage. The Kia pro_cee'd seats 5 vs 4.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 10.6m

TightestFiat 500 DolcevitaTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Fiat 500 Dolcevita
9.3mTighter
Best
Kia pro_cee'd GT
10.6m
Worst
Kia pro_cee'd GT
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Fiat 500 Dolcevita
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestFiat 500Tightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Kia pro_cee'd10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Fiat 500Tightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Kia pro_cee'd and $1,368/year for the Fiat 500. That is a $741 annual difference in favour of the Fiat 500.

Warranty: 7 years (Kia pro_cee'd) vs 3 years / 150,000km (Fiat 500). The Kia pro_cee'd has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Kia pro_cee'd if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Fiat 500 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Fiat's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Kia pro_cee'd: Top CarSorted Score, 55 vs 51

The Kia pro_cee'd comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (55 vs 51), taking 3 of 5 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: reliability (Kia pro_cee'd ahead by 28), fuel economy (Fiat 500 ahead by 24), performance (Kia pro_cee'd ahead by 23). The Fiat 500 will save you roughly $741 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia pro_cee'd has a clear edge. The Kia pro_cee'd adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Kia pro_cee'd and Fiat 500?

The Fiat 500 is the cheapest at $28,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Kia pro_cee'd by $1,090.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Fiat 500 uses the least fuel at 4.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Kia pro_cee'd and Fiat 500 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia pro_cee'd has the largest boot at 380L with the seats up (1,225L with the seats folded).

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia pro_cee'd has the longest warranty at 7 years / No data.

Which is the most powerful?

The Kia pro_cee'd makes the most power at 150kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars