Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Toyota Kluger
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Price TBC
SUV
Petrol
2.0L Ingenium 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol
184kW
8.3 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
472L
Toyota Kluger
From $62,410
SUV
Hybrid
2.5L 4-cyl Hybrid
184kW
5.6 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
241L
Track the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque & Toyota Kluger
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque features a 11.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota Kluger gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats, power tailgate, Meridian audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Toyota Kluger. The Toyota Kluger counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets grained leather upholstery while the Toyota Kluger offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 3-zone in the Toyota Kluger.
Drivetrain
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses a 2.0L Ingenium 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol producing 184kW and 365Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.6 seconds.
The Toyota Kluger responds with a 2.5L 4-cyl Hybrid making 184kW and 242Nm, paired to a cvt driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.
Power output is identical on paper, so the difference comes down to tuning, weight distribution, and suspension. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque measures 4,371mm long on a 2,681mm wheelbase, 595mm shorter than the Toyota Kluger at 4,966mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Kluger generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 472L in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 241L in the Toyota Kluger, giving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque a 231L advantage. The Toyota Kluger seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Toyota Kluger leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.4m to 11.6m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,366/year for the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and $1,596/year for the Toyota Kluger. That is a $770 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Kluger.
Estimated annual total: $2,366 (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) vs $1,596 (Toyota Kluger). The Toyota Kluger saves you roughly $770 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Kluger). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque if: You need more boot space, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota Kluger if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The Toyota Kluger will save you roughly $770 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and Toyota Kluger?
The Toyota Kluger is the cheapest at $62,410 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota Kluger uses the least fuel at 5.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Toyota Kluger all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the largest boot at 472L.
Which can tow the most?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet
Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
