CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLand Rover Range Rover Sport vs Isuzu MU-X
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs Isuzu MU-X

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecLand RoverIsuzu
Price (RRP)TBC$43,900
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power183kW120kW
0-100 km/h7.7s11s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space835L311L
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited6yr / 150k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Land Rover Range Rover Sport & Isuzu MU-X

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport features a 13.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 13.7-inch digital dash, while the Isuzu MU-X gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport stands out with wireless charging, heated front seats, power tailgate, Meridian audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Isuzu MU-X. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets leather upholstery while the Isuzu MU-X offers cloth. Climate control is 3-zone in the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and 2-zone in the Isuzu MU-X.

Drivetrain

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport uses a 3.0 i6 Diesel Mild Hybrid producing 183kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.7 seconds.

The Isuzu MU-X responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11 seconds.

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport has the clear power advantage at 183kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 3.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport measures 4,946mm long on a 2,997mm wheelbase, 86mm longer than the Isuzu MU-X at 4,860mm (2,855mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Range Rover Sport generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 835L in the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and 311L in the Isuzu MU-X, giving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport a 524L advantage. The Isuzu MU-X seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Isuzu MU-X leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.6m

Land Rover Range Rover Sport Dynamic SE D250
11.0mTighter
Best
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m
Worst
Land Rover Range Rover Sport Dynamic SE D250
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L 4x2
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and $1,824/year for the Isuzu MU-X. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the Isuzu MU-X.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) vs $1,824 (Isuzu MU-X). The Isuzu MU-X saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) vs 6 years / 150,000km (Isuzu MU-X). The Isuzu MU-X has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Sport if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Isuzu MU-X if: You want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Isuzu's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Isuzu MU-X will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a clear edge. The Isuzu MU-X adds peace of mind with a longer 6-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Land Rover Range Rover Sport and Isuzu MU-X?

The Isuzu MU-X is the cheapest at $43,900 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Isuzu MU-X uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Isuzu MU-X all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport has the largest boot at 835L.

Which can tow the most?

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Isuzu MU-X has the longest warranty at 6 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport makes the most power at 183kW. The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is quickest to 100km/h in 7.7s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs