Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs Toyota Kluger
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Price TBC
SUV
Diesel
3.0 i6 Diesel Mild Hybrid
183kW
7.4 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
835L
Toyota Kluger
From $62,410
SUV
Hybrid
2.5L 4-cyl Hybrid
184kW
5.6 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
241L
Track the Land Rover Range Rover Sport & Toyota Kluger
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport features a 13.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 13.7-inch digital dash, while the Toyota Kluger gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats, power tailgate, Meridian audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Toyota Kluger. The Toyota Kluger counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets leather upholstery while the Toyota Kluger offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport uses a 3.0 i6 Diesel Mild Hybrid producing 183kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.7 seconds.
The Toyota Kluger responds with a 2.5L 4-cyl Hybrid making 184kW and 242Nm, paired to a cvt driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.
The Toyota Kluger has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 183kW. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport measures 4,946mm long on a 2,997mm wheelbase, 20mm shorter than the Toyota Kluger at 4,966mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Range Rover Sport generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 835L in the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and 241L in the Toyota Kluger, giving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport a 594L advantage. The Toyota Kluger seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 11.4m
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and $1,596/year for the Toyota Kluger. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Kluger.
Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) vs $1,596 (Toyota Kluger). The Toyota Kluger saves you roughly $513 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Kluger). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Sport if: You need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota Kluger if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Toyota Kluger will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Land Rover Range Rover Sport and Toyota Kluger?
The Toyota Kluger is the cheapest at $62,410 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota Kluger uses the least fuel at 5.6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Toyota Kluger all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport has the largest boot at 835L.
Which can tow the most?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Toyota Kluger makes the most power at 184kW. The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is quickest to 100km/h in 7.7s.
Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet
Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
