CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsLand Rover Range Rover Velar vs Toyota Fortuner
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Land Rover Range Rover Velar vs Toyota Fortuner

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecLand RoverToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$53,775
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power184kW150kW
0-100 km/h7.5s9.5s
Fuel Economy7.8 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space748L200L
Towing2,400kg3,100kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Land Rover Range Rover Velar & Toyota Fortuner

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar features a 11.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota Fortuner gets a 8-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate, Meridian audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Toyota Fortuner. The Toyota Fortuner counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets leather upholstery while the Toyota Fortuner offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the Land Rover Range Rover Velar and 1-zone in the Toyota Fortuner.

Drivetrain

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar uses a 2.0L I4 Turbo Petrol producing 184kW and 365Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.5 seconds.

The Toyota Fortuner responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar measures 4,797mm long on a 2,874mm wheelbase, 2mm longer than the Toyota Fortuner at 4,795mm (2,745mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Land Rover Range Rover Velar generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 748L in the Land Rover Range Rover Velar and 200L in the Toyota Fortuner, giving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar a 548L advantage. The Toyota Fortuner seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Toyota Fortuner leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 2,400kg. That 700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 11.9m

Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6mTighter
Best
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Dynamic SE P250
11.9m
Worst
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Dynamic SE P250
11.9m · Average

Based on 11.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,223/year for the Land Rover Range Rover Velar and $2,166/year for the Toyota Fortuner. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Fortuner.

Estimated annual total: $2,223 (Land Rover Range Rover Velar) vs $2,166 (Toyota Fortuner). The Toyota Fortuner saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Velar) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Fortuner). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Velar if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Fortuner if: You want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Toyota Fortuner will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Land Rover Range Rover Velar and Toyota Fortuner?

The Toyota Fortuner is the cheapest at $53,775 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Fortuner uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Land Rover Range Rover Velar and Toyota Fortuner carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar has the largest boot at 748L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Fortuner has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,100kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar makes the most power at 184kW. The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is quickest to 100km/h in 7.5s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs