CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda 6 vs Skoda Superb
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda 6 vs Skoda Superb

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Skoda Superb: we're still completing kerb weight, ground clearance and CO2 emissions.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMazdaSkoda
Price (RRP)$29,740$39,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power125kW162kW
0-100 km/h7s
Fuel Economy8.4 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space519L625L
Towing1,500kg2,000kg
Warranty3yr / Unlimited3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Mazda 6 & Skoda Superb

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda 6 starts from $29,740 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Superb opens at $39,990. That makes the Mazda 6 the more affordable entry point by $10,250.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $32,714 and $43,989 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Superb by roughly $2,850 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

Drivetrain

The Mazda 6 uses a 2.5 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT producing 125kW and 226Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed manual / 5-speed automatic to a FWD layout.

The Skoda Superb responds with a 2.0-litre turbocharged 4-cylinder petrol making 162kW and 350Nm, paired to a 6-speed dsg dual-clutch automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7 seconds.

The Skoda Superb has the clear power advantage at 162kW vs 125kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda 6 measures 4,735mm long on a 2,725mm wheelbase, 126mm shorter than the Skoda Superb at 4,861mm (2,841mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Superb generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 519L in the Mazda 6 and 625L in the Skoda Superb, giving the Skoda Superb a 106L advantage.

For towing, the Skoda Superb leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.7m

TightestMazda 6 LimitedTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda 6 Limited
11.0mTighter
Best
Skoda Superb 162TSI Sedan
11.7m
Worst
Mazda 6 Limited
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Superb 162TSI Sedan
11.7m · Average

Based on 11.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda 6Tightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda 6Tightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Skoda Superb11.7 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the Mazda 6 and $1,824/year for the Skoda Superb. That is a $570 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Superb.

Estimated annual total: $2,394 (Mazda 6) vs $1,824 (Skoda Superb). The Skoda Superb saves you roughly $570 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 3 years (Mazda 6) vs 3 years (Skoda Superb). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda 6 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Superb if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Superb takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The Skoda Superb will save you roughly $570 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Superb has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda 6 and Skoda Superb?

The Mazda 6 is the cheapest at $29,740 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Superb by $10,250.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Superb uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda 6 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Superb has the largest boot at 625L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Superb has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Skoda Superb makes the most power at 162kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best family cars