CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda BT-50 vs Ford Transit Custom
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda BT-50 vs Ford Transit Custom

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaFord
Price (RRP)$36,400$62,990
Power120kW125kW
0-100 km/h10.9s
Fuel Economy7.1 L/100km7.8 L/100km
Boot Space6800L
Towing3,500kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda BT-50 starts from $36,400 before on-road costs, while the Ford Transit Custom opens at $62,990. That makes the Mazda BT-50 the more affordable entry point by $26,590.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $40,040 and $69,289 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda BT-50 and Ford Transit Custom hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 86% for the Mazda BT-50 and 84% for the Ford Transit Custom.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 1 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda BT-50 and 4 in the Ford Transit Custom.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda BT-50 features a 7-inch touchscreen, while the Ford Transit Custom gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

Drivetrain

The Mazda BT-50 uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Ford Transit Custom responds with a Diesel making 125kW and 385Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels.

The Ford Transit Custom has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 120kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda BT-50 measures 5,320mm long on a 3,125mm wheelbase, 345mm longer than the Ford Transit Custom at 4,975mm (3,300mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Transit Custom generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5m diameter

Large

Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m
Mazda BT-50
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,024/year for the Mazda BT-50 and $2,223/year for the Ford Transit Custom. That is a $199 annual difference in favour of the Mazda BT-50.

Estimated annual total: $2,024 (Mazda BT-50) vs $2,223 (Ford Transit Custom). The Mazda BT-50 saves you roughly $199 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Transit Custom). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Transit Custom if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda BT-50 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda BT-50 will save you roughly $199 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda BT-50 and Ford Transit Custom?

The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $36,400 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford Transit Custom by $26,590.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda BT-50 uses the least fuel at 7.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda BT-50 and Ford Transit Custom all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda BT-50 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Transit Custom makes the most power at 125kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · All Vans