Mazda CX-3 vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-3 starts from $27,800 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max opens at $38,990. That makes the Mazda CX-3 the more affordable entry point by $11,190.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,580 and $42,889 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-3 by roughly $2,995 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mazda CX-3 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 99% for the Mazda CX-3 and 82% for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mazda CX-3.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-3 and 10 in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-3 features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda CX-3 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate and Sony audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-3 uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 195Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max responds with a Petrol making 180kW and 375Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is 2.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-3 measures 4,275mm long on a 2,570mm wheelbase, 445mm shorter than the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max at 4,720mm (2,710mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 350L in the Mazda CX-3 and 550L in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max, giving the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max a 200L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 11.8m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-3 and $2,309/year for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max. That is a $599 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-3.
Estimated annual total: $1,710 (Mazda CX-3) vs $2,309 (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max). The Mazda CX-3 saves you roughly $599 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-3) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max). The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-3 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. The Mazda CX-3 will save you roughly $599 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-3 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max?
The Mazda CX-3 is the cheapest at $27,800 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max by $11,190.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda CX-3 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-3 and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the largest boot at 550L.
Which can tow the most?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max makes the most power at 180kW. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
