CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs Mitsubishi ASX
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs Mitsubishi ASX

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryMitsubishi
Price (RRP)$36,100$37,740
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power180kW113kW
0-100 km/h7.3s11.9s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space117L484L
Towing1,300kg1,200kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited10yr / 200k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars4 Stars

Track the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max & Mitsubishi ASX

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max starts from $36,100 before on-road costs, while the Mitsubishi ASX opens at $37,740. That makes the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max the more affordable entry point by $1,640.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $39,710 and $41,514 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mitsubishi ASX by roughly $2,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Mitsubishi ASX. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 76% for the Mitsubishi ASX.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max, against 5 on the Mitsubishi ASX.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 10 in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 7 in the Mitsubishi ASX.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mitsubishi ASX gets a 10.4-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate and Sony audio that you will not find on the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Mitsubishi ASX offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 1-zone in the Mitsubishi ASX.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max uses a Petrol producing 180kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.3 seconds.

The Mitsubishi ASX responds with a Petrol making 113kW and 270Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.9 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 113kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is 4.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max measures 4,720mm long on a 2,710mm wheelbase, 482mm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX at 4,238mm (2,639mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 117L in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 484L in the Mitsubishi ASX, giving the Mitsubishi ASX a 367L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max leads with a 1,300kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.1m to 11.8m

TightestMitsubishi ASX LSTightest turn at 11.1m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mitsubishi ASX LS
11.1mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max Urban FWD
11.8m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max Urban FWD
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mitsubishi ASX LS
11.1m · Average

Based on 11.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMitsubishi ASXTightest turn at 11.1m, needs the least road to swing around
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Mitsubishi ASXTightest11.1 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and $1,824/year for the Mitsubishi ASX. That is a $485 annual difference in favour of the Mitsubishi ASX.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs $1,824 (Mitsubishi ASX). The Mitsubishi ASX saves you roughly $485 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi ASX). The Mitsubishi ASX has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mitsubishi ASX if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max takes 5 of 8 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mitsubishi ASX will save you roughly $485 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi ASX has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi ASX adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and Mitsubishi ASX?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is the cheapest at $36,100 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mitsubishi ASX by $1,640.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mitsubishi ASX uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the largest boot at 484L.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mitsubishi ASX has the longest warranty at 10 years / 200k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max makes the most power at 180kW. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is quickest to 100km/h in 7.3s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs