CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs Suzuki Vitara
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs Suzuki Vitara

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCherySuzuki
Price (RRP)$38,990$38,490
Power180kW95kW
0-100 km/h8.5s10.2s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km5.8 L/100km
Boot Space550L375L
Towing2,000kg1,200kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km3yr / 100k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max starts from $38,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Vitara opens at $38,490. That makes the Suzuki Vitara the more affordable entry point by $500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $42,889 and $42,339 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Vitara by roughly $3,280 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and Suzuki Vitara hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 77% for the Suzuki Vitara.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 10 in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 6 in the Suzuki Vitara.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Suzuki Vitara gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max stands out with power tailgate and Sony audio that you will not find on the Suzuki Vitara. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max uses a Petrol producing 180kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The Suzuki Vitara responds with a Petrol making 95kW and 220Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 95kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max measures 4,720mm long on a 2,710mm wheelbase, 545mm longer than the Suzuki Vitara at 4,175mm (2,500mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 550L in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 375L in the Suzuki Vitara, giving the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max a 175L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 800kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.2m to 11.8m

Suzuki Vitara GLX Turbo
10.2mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max Urban FWD
11.8m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Vitara
10.2m · Good

Based on 10.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and $1,653/year for the Suzuki Vitara. That is a $656 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Vitara.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs $1,653 (Suzuki Vitara). The Suzuki Vitara saves you roughly $656 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Vitara). The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Vitara if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. The Suzuki Vitara will save you roughly $656 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and Suzuki Vitara?

The Suzuki Vitara is the cheapest at $38,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max by $500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Vitara uses the least fuel at 5.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and Suzuki Vitara all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the largest boot at 550L.

Which can tow the most?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max makes the most power at 180kW. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs