Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs GWM Haval H6
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max & GWM Haval H6
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max starts from $36,100 before on-road costs, while the GWM Haval H6 opens at $35,990. That makes the GWM Haval H6 the more affordable entry point by $110.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $39,710 and $39,589 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GWM Haval H6 by roughly $1,000 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and GWM Haval H6 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 88% for the GWM Haval H6.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on both.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 10 in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 6 in the GWM Haval H6.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the GWM Haval H6 gets a 14.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max stands out with wireless charging and Sony audio — features our data doesn't list for the GWM Haval H6. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max uses a Petrol producing 180kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.3 seconds.
The GWM Haval H6 responds with a Petrol making 170kW and 380Nm, paired to a 9-speed dual clutch transmission driving the front wheels.
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 170kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max measures 4,720mm long on a 2,710mm wheelbase, 17mm longer than the GWM Haval H6 at 4,703mm (2,738mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval H6 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 117L in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 560L in the GWM Haval H6, giving the GWM Haval H6 a 443L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the GWM Haval H6 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.8m to 11.9m
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.9m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and $2,109/year for the GWM Haval H6. That is a $200 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval H6.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H6). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GWM Haval H6 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The GWM Haval H6 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The GWM Haval H6 will save you roughly $200 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval H6 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and GWM Haval H6?
The GWM Haval H6 is the cheapest at $35,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max by $110.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The GWM Haval H6 uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and GWM Haval H6 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The GWM Haval H6 has the largest boot at 560L.
Which can tow the most?
The GWM Haval H6 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max makes the most power at 180kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
