Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs KGM Torres
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max
From $36,100
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
180kW
8.1 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
117L
KGM Torres
From $34,990
SUV
Petrol
Turbo GDi
120kW
7.9 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
455L
Track the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max & KGM Torres
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max starts from $36,100 before on-road costs, while the KGM Torres opens at $34,990. That makes the KGM Torres the more affordable entry point by $1,110.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $39,710 and $38,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the KGM Torres gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate and Sony audio that you will not find on the KGM Torres. The KGM Torres counters with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max gets synthetic leather upholstery while the KGM Torres offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 1-zone in the KGM Torres.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max uses a Petrol producing 180kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.3 seconds.
The KGM Torres responds with a Turbo GDi making 120kW and 280Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.8 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is 4.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max measures 4,720mm long on a 2,710mm wheelbase, 20mm longer than the KGM Torres at 4,700mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 117L in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 455L in the KGM Torres, giving the KGM Torres a 338L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the KGM Torres leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m to 11.8m
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and $2,252/year for the KGM Torres. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the KGM Torres.
Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs $2,252 (KGM Torres). The KGM Torres saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the KGM Torres if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The KGM Torres takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The KGM Torres will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Torres has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and KGM Torres?
The KGM Torres is the cheapest at $34,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max by $1,110.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The KGM Torres uses the least fuel at 7.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The KGM Torres has the largest boot at 455L.
Which can tow the most?
The KGM Torres has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max makes the most power at 180kW. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is quickest to 100km/h in 7.3s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
