Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs KGM Torres
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max starts from $36,100 before on-road costs, while the KGM Torres opens at $34,990. That makes the KGM Torres the more affordable entry point by $1,110.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $39,710 and $38,489 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the KGM Torres gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate and Sony audio that you will not find on the KGM Torres. The KGM Torres counters with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max gets synthetic leather upholstery while the KGM Torres offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 1-zone in the KGM Torres.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max uses a Petrol producing 180kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.
The KGM Torres responds with a Turbo GDi making 120kW and 280Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.8 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is 3.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max measures 4,720mm long on a 2,710mm wheelbase, 20mm longer than the KGM Torres at 4,700mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 550L in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 455L in the KGM Torres, giving the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max a 95L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.2m to 11.8m
Based on 11.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and $2,252/year for the KGM Torres. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the KGM Torres.
Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs $2,252 (KGM Torres). The KGM Torres saves you roughly $57 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the KGM Torres if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The KGM Torres will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and KGM Torres?
The KGM Torres is the cheapest at $34,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max by $1,110.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The KGM Torres uses the least fuel at 7.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the largest boot at 550L.
Which can tow the most?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max makes the most power at 180kW. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
