CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs KGM Torres
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs KGM Torres

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 28 Aug 2026, price 23 Sep 2026

Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro MaxUrban FWD10?02
KGM TorresELX7?05

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecCheryKGM
Price (RRP)$36,100 est.$34,990
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$36,100est. RRP

  • with the KGM Torres's standard kit: $36,100 (nothing to add)

$34,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power180kW120kW
0-100 km/h7.3s11.8s
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km7.9 L/100km
Boot (seats up)117L455L
Towing1,300kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max & KGM Torres

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max starts from $36,100 (our estimated RRP; the brand lists drive-away prices only) before on-road costs, while the KGM Torres opens at $34,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $39,710 and $38,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max

None open on our record

KGM Torres

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the KGM Torres gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate and Sony audio — features our data doesn't list for the KGM Torres. The KGM Torres counters with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max gets synthetic leather upholstery while the KGM Torres offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 1-zone in the KGM Torres.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max uses a Petrol producing 180kW and 375Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.3 seconds.

The KGM Torres responds with a Turbo GDi making 120kW and 280Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.8 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max has the clear power advantage at 180kW vs 120kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is 4.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max measures 4,720mm long on a 2,710mm wheelbase, 20mm longer than the KGM Torres at 4,700mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 117L in the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and 455L in the KGM Torres, giving the KGM Torres a 338L advantage. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the KGM Torres leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.8m

TightestKGM Torres ELXTightest turn at 11.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
KGM Torres ELX
11.2mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max Urban FWD
11.8m
Worst
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max Urban FWD
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Torres ELX
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKGM TorresTightest turn at 11.2m, needs the least road to swing around
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
KGM TorresTightest11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and $2,252/year for the KGM Torres. That is a $57 annual difference in favour of the KGM Torres.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Torres if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max: Top CarSorted Score, 75 vs 67, but the KGM Torres is $1,110 cheaper

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (75 vs 67), taking 2 of 5 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max ahead by 31), performance (Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max ahead by 21), practicality (KGM Torres ahead by 10). The KGM Torres will save you roughly $57 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Torres has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max and KGM Torres?

The KGM Torres is the cheapest at $34,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max by $1,110.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The KGM Torres uses the least fuel at 7.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for KGM Torres, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Torres has the largest boot at 455L with the seats up.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Torres has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max makes the most power at 180kW. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max is quickest to 100km/h in 7.3s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs