CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Torres vs Volkswagen T-Cross
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Torres vs Volkswagen T-Cross

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMVolkswagen
Price (RRP)$34,990$34,990
Power120kW85kW
0-100 km/h11.8s9.8s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km5.5 L/100km
Boot Space455L392L
Towing1,500kg1,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Price Breakdown

The KGM Torres starts from $34,990 before on-road costs, while the Volkswagen T-Cross opens at $34,990. Both land at the same RRP, so on-road costs and dealer deals become the real differentiator.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,489 and $38,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volkswagen T-Cross by roughly $3,420 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Torres features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Volkswagen T-Cross gets a 8-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Torres stands out with ambient lighting that you will not find on the Volkswagen T-Cross. The Volkswagen T-Cross counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Torres gets leather upholstery while the Volkswagen T-Cross offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The KGM Torres uses a Turbo GDi producing 120kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.8 seconds.

The Volkswagen T-Cross responds with a Petrol making 85kW and 200Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.8 seconds.

The KGM Torres has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 85kW. In the real-world sprint, the Volkswagen T-Cross is 2.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Torres measures 4,700mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 592mm longer than the Volkswagen T-Cross at 4,108mm (2,563mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Torres generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 455L in the KGM Torres and 392L in the Volkswagen T-Cross, giving the KGM Torres a 63L advantage.

For towing, the KGM Torres leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.2m

KGM Torres ELX
11.2mTighter
Best
Volkswagen T-Cross 85TSI Life
11.2m
Best
KGM Torres
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Volkswagen T-Cross
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the KGM Torres and $1,568/year for the Volkswagen T-Cross. That is a $684 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen T-Cross.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (KGM Torres) vs $1,568 (Volkswagen T-Cross). The Volkswagen T-Cross saves you roughly $684 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen T-Cross). The KGM Torres has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Torres if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Volkswagen T-Cross if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Torres takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Volkswagen T-Cross will save you roughly $684 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Torres has a clear edge. The KGM Torres adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Torres and Volkswagen T-Cross?

The KGM Torres is the cheapest at $34,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen T-Cross uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of KGM Torres and Volkswagen T-Cross carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Torres has the largest boot at 455L.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Torres has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Torres has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Torres makes the most power at 120kW. The Volkswagen T-Cross is quickest to 100km/h in 9.8s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs