CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Torres vs Suzuki Jimny
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Torres vs Suzuki Jimny

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMSuzuki
Price (RRP)$34,990$33,150
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power120kW75kW
0-100 km/h11.8s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km6.4 L/100km
Boot Space455L85L
Towing1,500kg1,300kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the KGM Torres & Suzuki Jimny

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The KGM Torres starts from $34,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Jimny opens at $33,150. That makes the Suzuki Jimny the more affordable entry point by $1,840.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,489 and $36,465 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Jimny by roughly $2,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Torres features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Jimny gets a 7-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Torres stands out with ambient lighting that you will not find on the Suzuki Jimny. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Torres gets leather upholstery while the Suzuki Jimny offers fabric.

Drivetrain

The KGM Torres uses a Turbo GDi producing 120kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.8 seconds.

The Suzuki Jimny responds with a 1.5L 4-cylinder petrol, VVT making 75kW and 130Nm, paired to a 5-speed manual driving all four wheels.

The KGM Torres has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 75kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Torres measures 4,700mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 1050mm longer than the Suzuki Jimny at 3,650mm (2,250mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Torres generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 455L in the KGM Torres and 85L in the Suzuki Jimny, giving the KGM Torres a 370L advantage. The KGM Torres seats 5 vs 4.

For towing, the KGM Torres leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.8m to 11.2m

TightestSuzuki Jimny LITETightest turn at 9.8m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Suzuki Jimny LITE
9.8mTighter
Best
KGM Torres ELX
11.2m
Worst
KGM Torres ELX
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Suzuki Jimny LITE
9.8m · Excellent

Based on 9.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestSuzuki JimnyTightest turn at 9.8m, needs the least road to swing around
KGM Torres11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Suzuki JimnyTightest9.8 m
Excellent△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the KGM Torres and $1,824/year for the Suzuki Jimny. That is a $428 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Jimny.

Estimated annual total: $2,252 (KGM Torres) vs $1,824 (Suzuki Jimny). The Suzuki Jimny saves you roughly $428 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres) vs 5 years (Suzuki Jimny). The KGM Torres has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Torres if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Suzuki Jimny if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Torres takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The Suzuki Jimny will save you roughly $428 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the KGM Torres has a clear edge. The KGM Torres adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Torres and Suzuki Jimny?

The Suzuki Jimny is the cheapest at $33,150 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Torres by $1,840.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Jimny uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of KGM Torres and Suzuki Jimny carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Torres has the largest boot at 455L.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Torres has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Torres has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Torres makes the most power at 120kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs