CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-5 vs Subaru Forester
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-5 vs Subaru Forester

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaSubaru
Price (RRP)$39,990$43,490
Power132kW136kW
0-100 km/h8.7s11.2s
Fuel Economy7.4 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space522L520L
Towing2,000kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-5 starts from $39,990 before on-road costs, while the Subaru Forester opens at $43,490. That makes the Mazda CX-5 the more affordable entry point by $3,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $43,989 and $47,839 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-5 by roughly $1,000 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 95% for the Mazda CX-5 and 83% for the Subaru Forester.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-5 packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 4 in the Subaru Forester.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-5 and 9 in the Subaru Forester.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-5 features a 12.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Subaru Forester gets a 11.6-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-5 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Subaru Forester. The Subaru Forester counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-5 uses a Petrol producing 132kW and 242Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.7 seconds.

The Subaru Forester responds with a Petrol making 136kW and 226Nm, paired to a cvt driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.2 seconds.

The Subaru Forester has the clear power advantage at 136kW vs 132kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-5 is 2.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-5 measures 4,575mm long on a 2,700mm wheelbase, 80mm shorter than the Subaru Forester at 4,655mm (2,670mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 522L in the Mazda CX-5 and 520L in the Subaru Forester, giving the Mazda CX-5 a 2L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-5 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.8m to 11.0m

Subaru Forester AWD
10.8mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-5 G25 Pure AWD
11.0m
Worst
Mazda CX-5
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Subaru Forester
10.8m · Good

Based on 10.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,109/year for the Mazda CX-5 and $2,309/year for the Subaru Forester. That is a $200 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-5.

Estimated annual total: $2,109 (Mazda CX-5) vs $2,309 (Subaru Forester). The Mazda CX-5 saves you roughly $200 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-5) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Subaru Forester). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-5 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Subaru Forester if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Subaru's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-5 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-5 will save you roughly $200 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester?

The Mazda CX-5 is the cheapest at $39,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Subaru Forester by $3,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-5 uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-5 has the largest boot at 522L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Subaru Forester makes the most power at 136kW. The Mazda CX-5 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.7s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs