CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-8 vs Kia Sportage
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-8 vs Kia Sportage

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaKia
Price (RRP)TBC$38,490
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power140kW115kW
Fuel Economy6 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space209L543L
Towing2,000kg1,650kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Mazda CX-8 & Kia Sportage

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-8 and Kia Sportage hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 96% for the Mazda CX-8 and 87% for the Kia Sportage.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Mazda CX-8, against 5 on the Kia Sportage.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-8 and 7 in the Kia Sportage.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-8 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Kia Sportage. The Kia Sportage counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-8 lines up producing 140kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a AWD layout.

The Kia Sportage responds with a Petrol making 115kW and 192Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels.

The Mazda CX-8 has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 115kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-8 measures 4,925mm long on a 2,930mm wheelbase, 240mm longer than the Kia Sportage at 4,685mm (2,755mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-8 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 209L in the Mazda CX-8 and 543L in the Kia Sportage, giving the Kia Sportage a 334L advantage. The Mazda CX-8 seats 6 vs 5.

For towing, the Mazda CX-8 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,650kg. That 350kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m to 11.6m

TightestKia Sportage S FWD PetrolTightest turn at 11.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Kia Sportage S FWD Petrol
11.4mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-8 Asaki LE AWD (6-seat, MY23)
11.6m
Worst
Mazda CX-8 Asaki LE AWD (6-seat, MY23)
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Kia Sportage S FWD Petrol
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKia SportageTightest turn at 11.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda CX-811.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Kia SportageTightest11.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-8 and $2,309/year for the Kia Sportage. That is a $599 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-8.

Warranty: 5 years (Mazda CX-8) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Sportage). The Kia Sportage has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-8 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia Sportage if: You need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-8 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Mazda CX-8 will save you roughly $599 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Kia Sportage has a clear edge. The Kia Sportage adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-8 and Kia Sportage?

The Kia Sportage is the cheapest at $38,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-8 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Mazda CX-8 and Kia Sportage all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Kia Sportage has the largest boot at 543L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-8 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Sportage has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-8 makes the most power at 140kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs