CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-9 vs Toyota Fortuner
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-9 vs Toyota Fortuner

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$53,775
Fuel typepetrolDiesel
Power170kW150kW
0-100 km/h9.5s
Fuel Economy9 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space230L200L
Towing2,000kg3,100kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Mazda CX-9 & Toyota Fortuner

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Toyota Fortuner counters with Apple CarPlay that the Mazda CX-9 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-9 lines up producing 170kW and 420Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a AWD layout.

The Toyota Fortuner responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-9 has the clear power advantage at 170kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-9 measures 5,075mm long on a 2,930mm wheelbase, 280mm longer than the Toyota Fortuner at 4,795mm (2,745mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-9 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 230L in the Mazda CX-9 and 200L in the Toyota Fortuner, giving the Mazda CX-9 a 30L advantage. The Toyota Fortuner seats 7 vs 6.

For towing, the Toyota Fortuner leads with a 3,100kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 1,100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 11.8m

TightestToyota Fortuner GXTightest turn at 11.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-9 Azami LE AWD (6-seat)
11.8m
Worst
Mazda CX-9 Azami LE AWD (6-seat)
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Fortuner GX
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota FortunerTightest turn at 11.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda CX-911.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Toyota FortunerTightest11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,565/year for the Mazda CX-9 and $2,166/year for the Toyota Fortuner. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Toyota Fortuner.

Estimated annual total: $2,565 (Mazda CX-9) vs $2,166 (Toyota Fortuner). The Toyota Fortuner saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-9) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Fortuner). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-9 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Fortuner if: You want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Mazda CX-9 and Toyota Fortuner trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Toyota Fortuner will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-9 and Toyota Fortuner?

The Toyota Fortuner is the cheapest at $53,775 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Fortuner uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mazda CX-9 and Toyota Fortuner carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-9 has the largest boot at 230L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Fortuner has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,100kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-9 makes the most power at 170kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs