CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda Mazda3 vs Peugeot 208
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda Mazda3 vs Peugeot 208

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Peugeot 208: we're still completing price, kerb weight, ground clearance and turning circle.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMazdaPeugeot
Price (RRP)$26,490TBC
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power114kW147kW
0-100 km/h6.8s
Fuel Economy5.9 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space295L311L
Towing1,200kg1,150kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Mazda Mazda3 & Peugeot 208

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda Mazda3 features a 8.8-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Peugeot 208 gets a 7-inch display.

The Mazda Mazda3 stands out with Apple CarPlay and head-up display — features our data doesn't list for the Peugeot 208. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda Mazda3 gets black cloth upholstery while the Peugeot 208 offers full grain black leather and caro cloth.

Drivetrain

The Mazda Mazda3 uses a 2.0 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol with i-stop and cylinder deactivation producing 114kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic (skyactiv-drive) to a FWD layout.

The Peugeot 208 responds with a 1.6L THP turbo petrol making 147kW and 275Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 6.8 seconds.

The Peugeot 208 has the clear power advantage at 147kW vs 114kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda Mazda3 measures 4,460mm long on a 2,725mm wheelbase, 498mm longer than the Peugeot 208 at 3,962mm (2,538mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 295L in the Mazda Mazda3 and 311L in the Peugeot 208, giving the Peugeot 208 a 16L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda Mazda3 leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 1,150kg. That 50kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m diameter

Good

Mazda Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m
Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6 m Ø

Good

9.0 m road
Mazda Mazda3 Turning circle · Ø 10.6 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.2 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.8 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,682/year for the Mazda Mazda3 and $1,682/year for the Peugeot 208.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda3) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Peugeot 208). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda Mazda3 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Peugeot 208 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Peugeot 208 takes 2 of 3 key spec categories. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda Mazda3 and Peugeot 208?

The Mazda Mazda3 is the cheapest at $26,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda Mazda3 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Peugeot 208 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mazda Mazda3, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Peugeot 208 has the largest boot at 311L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda Mazda3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Peugeot 208 makes the most power at 147kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars