CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Mercedes-Benz AMG GT vs Nissan GT-R
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT vs Nissan GT-R

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Coupes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Nissan GT-R: we're still completing length, width, height, wheelbase and kerb weight, plus 6 others.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecMercedes-BenzNissan
Price (RRP)$373,000$168,800
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power430kW390kW
0-100 km/h3.2s—
Fuel Economy14.6 L/100km11.9 L/100km
Boot Space321L—
Warranty5yr / Unlimited—
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT & Nissan GT-R

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT starts from $373,000 before on-road costs, while the Nissan GT-R opens at $168,800. That makes the Nissan GT-R the more affordable entry point by $204,200.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $410,300 and $185,680 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Nissan GT-R by roughly $3,845 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT stands out with Apple CarPlay, head-up display, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate and Burmester audio — features our data doesn't list for the Nissan GT-R. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT uses a Petrol producing 430kW and 800Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.2 seconds.

The Nissan GT-R responds with a Petrol making 390kW and 612Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic (gvg '6 spd auto'); release: revised 'r mode' and magnesium paddle shift driving all four wheels.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT has the clear power advantage at 430kW vs 390kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5m diameter

Large

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 4MATIC+
12.5m
←
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 4MATIC+
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5 m Ø

Large

9.0 m road
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Turning circle · Ø 12.5 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 11.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

2.0 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $4,161/year for the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT and $3,392/year for the Nissan GT-R. That is a $769 annual difference in favour of the Nissan GT-R.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan GT-R if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Nissan GT-R takes 2 of 3 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Nissan GT-R will save you roughly $769 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT and Nissan GT-R?

The Nissan GT-R is the cheapest at $168,800 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT by $204,200.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Nissan GT-R uses the least fuel at 11.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mercedes-Benz AMG GT and Nissan GT-R carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT makes the most power at 430kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Coupes · Best family cars