CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMitsubishi Outlander PHEV vs CUPRA Formentor
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV vs CUPRA Formentor

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMitsubishiCUPRA
Price (RRP)$53,990$54,990
Range (WLTP)84km
Battery20 kWh
Power98kW140kW
0-100 km/h8.7s7s
Max DC Charge50kW
10-80% Charge Time38 min
Fuel Economy7.3 L/100km7 L/100km
Boot Space478L420L
Towing2,000kg1,700kg
Warranty10yr / 200k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV starts from $53,990 before on-road costs, while the CUPRA Formentor opens at $54,990. That makes the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $59,389 and $60,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and CUPRA Formentor hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 93% for the CUPRA Formentor.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The CUPRA Formentor packs more ADAS features with 8 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 7 in the CUPRA Formentor.

Feature Showdown

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the CUPRA Formentor gets a 12.9-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the CUPRA Formentor. The CUPRA Formentor counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, heated front seats and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV uses a Petrol producing 98kW and 195Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.7 seconds.

The CUPRA Formentor responds with a 4-cyl Turbo Petrol making 140kW and 320Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7 seconds.

The CUPRA Formentor has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 98kW. In the real-world sprint, the CUPRA Formentor is 1.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV measures 4,710mm long on a 2,705mm wheelbase, 260mm longer than the CUPRA Formentor at 4,450mm (2,680mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 478L in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and 420L in the CUPRA Formentor, giving the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV a 58L advantage. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,700kg. That 300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.7m to 11.0m

CUPRA Formentor V
10.7mTighter
Best
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV ES
11.0m
Worst
Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
CUPRA Formentor
10.7m · Good

Based on 10.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,081/year for the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and $1,995/year for the CUPRA Formentor. That is a $86 annual difference in favour of the CUPRA Formentor.

Estimated annual total: $2,081 (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) vs $1,995 (CUPRA Formentor). The CUPRA Formentor saves you roughly $86 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 200,000km (Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) vs 5 years / 999,999km (CUPRA Formentor). The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Mitsubishi's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the CUPRA Formentor if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer CUPRA's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV takes 4 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The CUPRA Formentor will save you roughly $86 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has a clear edge. The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs