CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsOmoda 5 vs GWM Haval Jolion
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Omoda 5 vs GWM Haval Jolion

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecOmodaGWM
Price (RRP)$25,490$23,990
Power108kW105kW
0-100 km/h10.5s9.5s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space358L400L
Towing1,500kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Omoda 5 starts from $25,490 before on-road costs, while the GWM Haval Jolion opens at $23,990. That makes the GWM Haval Jolion the more affordable entry point by $1,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $28,039 and $26,389 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GWM Haval Jolion by roughly $1,425 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Omoda 5 and GWM Haval Jolion hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Omoda 5 and 90% for the GWM Haval Jolion.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Haval Jolion packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 2 in the Omoda 5.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Omoda 5 and 6 in the GWM Haval Jolion.

Feature Showdown

The Omoda 5 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the GWM Haval Jolion gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Haval Jolion counters with power tailgate that the Omoda 5 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Omoda 5 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The GWM Haval Jolion responds with a Petrol making 105kW and 210Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The Omoda 5 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 105kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Haval Jolion is 1.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Omoda 5 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 165mm shorter than the GWM Haval Jolion at 4,472mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM Haval Jolion generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 358L in the Omoda 5 and 400L in the GWM Haval Jolion, giving the GWM Haval Jolion a 42L advantage.

For towing, the GWM Haval Jolion leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 12.0m

Omoda 5 FX
10.6mTighter
Best
GWM Haval Jolion Premium
12.0m
Worst
Omoda 5
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Haval Jolion
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Omoda 5 and $1,682/year for the GWM Haval Jolion. That is a $285 annual difference in favour of the GWM Haval Jolion.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Omoda 5) vs $1,682 (GWM Haval Jolion). The GWM Haval Jolion saves you roughly $285 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Omoda 5) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval Jolion). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Omoda 5)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Omoda 5 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Omoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Haval Jolion if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Haval Jolion takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The GWM Haval Jolion will save you roughly $285 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval Jolion has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Omoda 5 and GWM Haval Jolion?

The GWM Haval Jolion is the cheapest at $23,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Omoda 5 by $1,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GWM Haval Jolion uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Omoda 5 and GWM Haval Jolion all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Haval Jolion has the largest boot at 400L.

Which can tow the most?

The Omoda 5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Omoda 5 makes the most power at 108kW. The GWM Haval Jolion is quickest to 100km/h in 9.5s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs