Omoda 5 vs Mazda CX-3
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Omoda 5 starts from $25,490 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-3 opens at $27,800. That makes the Omoda 5 the more affordable entry point by $2,310.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $28,039 and $30,580 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-3 by roughly $1,285 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Omoda 5 and Mazda CX-3 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 82% for the Omoda 5 and 99% for the Mazda CX-3.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Omoda 5 packs more ADAS features with 2 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Mazda CX-3.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Omoda 5 and 6 in the Mazda CX-3.
Feature Showdown
The Omoda 5 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-3 gets a 8-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Omoda 5 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.
The Mazda CX-3 responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 195Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.
The Mazda CX-3 has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 108kW. In the real-world sprint, the Omoda 5 is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Omoda 5 measures 4,307mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 32mm longer than the Mazda CX-3 at 4,275mm (2,570mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Omoda 5 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 358L in the Omoda 5 and 350L in the Mazda CX-3, giving the Omoda 5 a 8L advantage.
For towing, the Omoda 5 leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 10.6m
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Omoda 5 and $1,710/year for the Mazda CX-3. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-3.
Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Omoda 5) vs $1,710 (Mazda CX-3). The Mazda CX-3 saves you roughly $257 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Omoda 5) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-3). The Omoda 5 has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Omoda 5)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Omoda 5 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Omoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-3 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Omoda 5 takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-3 will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. The Omoda 5 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Omoda 5 and Mazda CX-3?
The Omoda 5 is the cheapest at $25,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-3 by $2,310.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda CX-3 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Omoda 5 and Mazda CX-3 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Omoda 5 has the largest boot at 358L.
Which can tow the most?
The Omoda 5 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Omoda 5 has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-3 makes the most power at 110kW. The Omoda 5 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.5s.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
