CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsPolestar 3 vs Toyota LandCruiser 300
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Polestar 3 vs Toyota LandCruiser 300

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecPolestarToyota
Price (RRP)$99,900$97,990
Range (WLTP)604km
Battery92 kWh
Power245kW227kW
0-100 km/h6.5s8.6s
Max DC Charge310kW
10-80% Charge Time22 min
Fuel Economy10.6 L/100km
Boot Space597L700L
Towing1,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Polestar 3 starts from $99,900 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 opens at $97,990. That makes the Toyota LandCruiser 300 the more affordable entry point by $1,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $109,890 and $107,789 respectively.

The Polestar 3 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Toyota LandCruiser 300, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Polestar 3 and Toyota LandCruiser 300 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 90% for the Polestar 3 and 85% for the Toyota LandCruiser 300.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Polestar 3 packs more ADAS features with 10 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Toyota LandCruiser 300.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Polestar 3 and 10 in the Toyota LandCruiser 300. The Polestar 3 adds a 360-degree camera that the Toyota LandCruiser 300 misses.

Feature Showdown

The Polestar 3 features a 14.5-inch touchscreen paired with a 9-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Polestar 3 stands out with head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate, Bowers & Wilkins audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Toyota LandCruiser 300. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Polestar 3 gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 300 offers cloth. Climate control is 3-zone in the Polestar 3 and 2-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 300.

Drivetrain

The Polestar 3 uses a Electric Motor producing 245kW and 480Nm of torque, sent through a single-speed fixed gear to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.5 seconds.

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 responds with a Diesel Twin-Turbo V6 making 227kW and 700Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.6 seconds.

The Polestar 3 has the clear power advantage at 245kW vs 227kW. In the real-world sprint, the Polestar 3 is 2.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Polestar 3 measures 4,900mm long on a 2,985mm wheelbase, 80mm shorter than the Toyota LandCruiser 300 at 4,980mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Polestar 3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 597L in the Polestar 3 and 700L in the Toyota LandCruiser 300, giving the Toyota LandCruiser 300 a 103L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 2,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.8m to 11.8m

Polestar 3 Rear Motor
11.8mTighter
Best
Toyota LandCruiser 300 GX
11.8m
Best
Polestar 3
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota LandCruiser 300
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Polestar 3) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 300). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Polestar 3 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Polestar's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 300 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Toyota LandCruiser 300 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Polestar 3 and Toyota LandCruiser 300?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 is the cheapest at $97,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Polestar 3 by $1,910.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 uses the least fuel at 10.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Polestar 3 and Toyota LandCruiser 300 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the largest boot at 700L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota LandCruiser 300 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Polestar 3 makes the most power at 245kW. The Polestar 3 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.5s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs