CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRenault Megane vs Mazda Mazda3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Renault Megane vs Mazda Mazda3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecRenaultMazda
Price (RRP)TBC$26,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power151kW114kW
0-100 km/h7.1s
Fuel Economy6 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot Space434L295L
Towing1,300kg1,200kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Renault Megane & Mazda Mazda3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Mazda Mazda3 counters with Apple CarPlay and head-up display. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Renault Megane uses a TCe 205 1.6L turbo petrol producing 151kW and 280Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dual-clutch (edc) to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.1 seconds.

The Mazda Mazda3 responds with a 2.0 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol with i-stop and cylinder deactivation making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic (skyactiv-drive) driving the front wheels.

The Renault Megane has the clear power advantage at 151kW vs 114kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Renault Megane measures 4,356mm long on a 2,670mm wheelbase, 104mm shorter than the Mazda Mazda3 at 4,460mm (2,725mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 434L in the Renault Megane and 295L in the Mazda Mazda3, giving the Renault Megane a 139L advantage.

For towing, the Renault Megane leads with a 1,300kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 100kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.4m to 10.6m

TightestRenault Megane GT (TCe 205)Tightest turn at 10.4m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Renault Megane GT (TCe 205)
10.4mTighter
Best
Mazda Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m
Worst
Renault Megane GT (TCe 205)
10.4m · Good

Based on 10.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestRenault MeganeTightest turn at 10.4m, needs the least road to swing around
Renault MeganeTightest10.4 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda Mazda310.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,710/year for the Renault Megane and $1,682/year for the Mazda Mazda3. That is a $28 annual difference in favour of the Mazda Mazda3.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Megane) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda3). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Renault Megane if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda3 if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Renault Megane takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Mazda Mazda3 will save you roughly $28 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Renault Megane has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Renault Megane and Mazda Mazda3?

The Mazda Mazda3 is the cheapest at $26,490 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda Mazda3 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Renault Megane and Mazda Mazda3 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Renault Megane has the largest boot at 434L.

Which can tow the most?

The Renault Megane has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Renault Megane makes the most power at 151kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars