Skoda Enyaq Coupe vs Volvo EX40
Two electric cars go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 28 Aug 2026, price 25 Jun 2026
Driver assistance, as the maker lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$70,990RRP
- no option data for this car
$69,990RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the Skoda Enyaq Coupe & Volvo EX40
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe starts from $70,990 before on-road costs, while the Volvo EX40 opens at $69,990. That makes the Volvo EX40 the more affordable entry point by $1,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $78,089 and $76,989 respectively.
Both models currently qualify for the electric-vehicle Fringe Benefits Tax exemption (battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold; battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold), a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
Skoda Enyaq Coupe
None open on our record
Volvo EX40
None open on our record
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
82kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 135kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 135kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
How long to charge
78kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 200kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 200kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe stands out with panoramic roof and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Volvo EX40. The Volvo EX40 counters with Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe runs a pure electric powertrain producing 210kW and 545Nm of torque, sent through its transmission to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.
The Volvo EX40 responds with a Electric making 185kW and 420Nm, paired to a single-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.3 seconds.
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe has the clear power advantage at 210kW vs 185kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Skoda Enyaq Coupe is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 82kWh (Skoda Enyaq Coupe) vs 82kWh (Volvo EX40), giving WLTP ranges of 561km and 520km. DC fast charging peaks at 135kW (Skoda Enyaq Coupe) vs 200kW (Volvo EX40).
Space & Comfort
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe measures 4,658mm long on a 2,766mm wheelbase, 218mm longer than the Volvo EX40 at 4,440mm (2,702mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Enyaq Coupe generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 570L in the Skoda Enyaq Coupe and 536L in the Volvo EX40, giving the Skoda Enyaq Coupe a 34L advantage.
For towing, the Skoda Enyaq Coupe leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.3m to 11.4m
Based on 9.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 7 years (Skoda Enyaq Coupe) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo EX40). The Skoda Enyaq Coupe has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Skoda Enyaq Coupe if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Volvo EX40 if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Volvo's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
Skoda Enyaq Coupe: Top CarSorted Score, 78 vs 68, but the Volvo EX40 is $1,000 cheaper
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (78 vs 68), taking 6 of 8 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: energy efficiency (Skoda Enyaq Coupe ahead by 24), safety (Skoda Enyaq Coupe ahead by 19), practicality (Skoda Enyaq Coupe ahead by 6). If boot space matters, the Skoda Enyaq Coupe has a clear edge. The Skoda Enyaq Coupe adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Skoda Enyaq Coupe and Volvo EX40?
The Volvo EX40 is the cheapest at $69,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Enyaq Coupe by $1,000.
Which has the longest driving range?
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe has the most range at 561km (WLTP).
Which charges fastest?
The Volvo EX40 accepts the highest DC charging at up to 200kW.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
Skoda Enyaq Coupe holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Volvo EX40, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which has the most boot space?
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe has the largest boot at 570L with the seats up.
Which can tow the most?
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe has the longest warranty at 7 years / No data.
Which is the most powerful?
The Skoda Enyaq Coupe makes the most power at 210kW. The Skoda Enyaq Coupe is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
