CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Skoda Fabia vs Mazda Mazda3
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Fabia vs Mazda Mazda3

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 12 Sep 2026, price 25 Jun 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Skoda FabiaSelect10?02
Mazda Mazda3G20 Pure10?02

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecSkodaMazda
Price (RRP)$27,990$26,490
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$27,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

$26,490RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power85kW114kW
0-100 km/h9.7s—
Fuel Economy5 L/100km5.9 L/100km
Boot (seats up)380L295L
Towing750kg1,200kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Skoda Fabia & Mazda Mazda3

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Fabia starts from $27,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda Mazda3 opens at $26,490. That makes the Mazda Mazda3 the more affordable entry point by $1,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $30,789 and $29,139 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Skoda Fabia by roughly $1,285 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Skoda Fabia

  • REC-005025 · published 4 Jan 2022Due to a manufacturing issue with the welding of the rear middle backrest frame there may be a reduction in the performance of the attached seat belt.Year range on the notice: 2021
  • REC-001196 · published 15 Oct 2019Due to a production fault, over time a crack in the transmissions pressure accumulator can occur.Year range on the notice: 2008 - 2015
  • REC-001199 · published 8 Jul 2019In some instances, the front driver air bag may not inflate to its fullest capacity fast enough when required.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2018
  • 1 more on the model page.

Mazda Mazda3

  • REC-005733 · published 1 Aug 2023Due to a manufacturing defect, the rear-view camera wiring harness may become damaged and could cause the rear-view image to become distorted or flicker.Year range on the notice: 2013 - 2020
  • REC-005009 · published 2 Dec 2021The low pressure fuel pump impeller may become deformed and cause the fuel pump to stop working.Year range on the notice: 2017 - 2019
  • REC-000896 · published 9 Jan 2020The Smart Brake Support (SBS) system may falsely detect an object in front of the vehicle, which may initiate the automatic brake function.Year range on the notice: 2019
  • 10 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Fabia features a 8.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 8-inch digital dash, while the Mazda Mazda3 gets a 8.8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda Mazda3 counters with head-up display. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Skoda Fabia gets cloth upholstery while the Mazda Mazda3 offers black cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the Skoda Fabia and 1-zone in the Mazda Mazda3.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Fabia uses a Petrol producing 85kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.7 seconds.

The Mazda Mazda3 responds with a 2.0 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC S-VT petrol with i-stop and cylinder deactivation making 114kW and 200Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic (skyactiv-drive) driving the front wheels.

The Mazda Mazda3 has the clear power advantage at 114kW vs 85kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Fabia measures 4,108mm long on a 2,564mm wheelbase, 352mm shorter than the Mazda Mazda3 at 4,460mm (2,725mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda Mazda3 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 380L in the Skoda Fabia and 295L in the Mazda Mazda3, giving the Skoda Fabia a 85L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda Mazda3 leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 450kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.7m

TightestMazda Mazda3 G20 PureTightest turn at 10.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6mTighter
Best
Skoda Fabia Select
10.7m
Worst
Skoda Fabia Select
10.7m · Good

Based on 10.7m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda3 G20 Pure
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda Mazda3Tightest turn at 10.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Skoda Fabia10.7 m
Good△ 3-point
Mazda Mazda3Tightest10.6 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,425/year for the Skoda Fabia and $1,682/year for the Mazda Mazda3. That is a $257 annual difference in favour of the Skoda Fabia.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Fabia) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda Mazda3). The Skoda Fabia has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Fabia if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda Mazda3 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Skoda Fabia: Top CarSorted Score, 79 vs 73, but the Mazda Mazda3 is $1,500 cheaper

The Skoda Fabia comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (79 vs 73), taking 3 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: safety (Skoda Fabia ahead by 23), fuel economy (Skoda Fabia ahead by 8), performance (Mazda Mazda3 ahead by 6). The Skoda Fabia will save you roughly $257 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Fabia has a clear edge. The Skoda Fabia adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Fabia and Mazda Mazda3?

The Mazda Mazda3 is the cheapest at $26,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Fabia by $1,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Fabia uses the least fuel at 5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Skoda Fabia holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Mazda Mazda3, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Fabia has the largest boot at 380L with the seats up (1,190L with the seats folded).

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda Mazda3 has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Fabia has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda Mazda3 makes the most power at 114kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars